메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국정치학회 한국정치학회보 한국정치학회보 제38집 제4호
발행연도
2004.12
수록면
241 - 260 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay is to examine the problems of non-entailing conception of claim-rights and their corresponding obligations advocated erroneously in Western liberal rights theories. While it, along with its advocating theories, has so far prevailed in the rights-centric discourses, it is not only theoretically self-contradictory but also morally unfounded enough as to cause serious practical problems. In exposing and examining these problems, I employ exemplification, structural analysis, and evaluation strategy. The result, reached through exemplifying and analyzing as well as evaluating the non-entailing conception, tells us that it is erroneous and that its structural features should be rectified into those of an entailing conception. And this rectification necessitates some other changes such as that in form categorization of rights and duties (obligations) of the claiming sort, that in their relationship, and that in the latter’s structure. Only with these systematic changes in the non-entailing conception, there can be expected a fair distribution of freedoms (benefits) and restrictions (burdens) between the concerned parties standing in right-obligation relations of the claiming sort.

목차

영어 초록
Ⅰ. Two Forms of Rights/Duties(Obligations) and Non-entailing Conception
Ⅱ. Entailing Conception as the Alternative
Ⅲ. Evaluating Two Kinds of Conceptions
Ⅳ. Concluding Remarks
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-340-017373120