지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.6
- 수록면
- 3 - 28 (28page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since the invention of Hunminjeongeum (훈민정음), the basic writing unit of 15th century Korean was in principle, Eojeol (어절); used as a syntactic word which coincides with an utterance unit, it is a combined form of a substantial word and functional morpheme. When an Eojeol as a syntactic unit did not coincide with an Eojeol as an utterance unit, a 'phonological word' or 'phonological phrase' could be used instead as a writing unit.
In 15th century Korean, a substantial word and a functional morpheme did not always have common written formulas. When a substantial word ending with a vowel was combined with a functional morpheme, the substantial word and the functional morpheme were written in the surface form respectively. In other words, when a phonological phenomenon like 'substitution,' 'assimilation,' 'deletion,' 'addition,' or 'contraction' took place, the output of the phenomenon was used in the writing of them. On the other hand, when a substantial word ending in a consonant was combined with a functional morpheme, the final consonant of the substantial word had various written forms which reflected those phonological phenomena, though the output of the aforementioned phonological phenomena was used in the writing of the functional morpheme.
When a surface form was derived from automatically applying phonological rules in the case of the combination of a substantial word ending in a consonant with a functional morpheme beginning with a consonant, it was a rule to write the surface form. However, the underlying form or intermediate forms in the process of derivation of the surface form could also be used. When an underlying form of a substantial word was phonologically conditioned, and if the substitution phenomenon was non-automatic or the surface form was a morphologically conditioned allomorphe of the underlying form, it was a rule to write the surface form. In the writing of a functional morpheme, however, the surface form was used as a rule whether the functional morpheme was phonologically or morphologically conditioned.
In 15th century Korean, a substantial word and a functional morpheme did not always have common written formulas. When a substantial word ending with a vowel was combined with a functional morpheme, the substantial word and the functional morpheme were written in the surface form respectively. In other words, when a phonological phenomenon like 'substitution,' 'assimilation,' 'deletion,' 'addition,' or 'contraction' took place, the output of the phenomenon was used in the writing of them. On the other hand, when a substantial word ending in a consonant was combined with a functional morpheme, the final consonant of the substantial word had various written forms which reflected those phonological phenomena, though the output of the aforementioned phonological phenomena was used in the writing of the functional morpheme.
When a surface form was derived from automatically applying phonological rules in the case of the combination of a substantial word ending in a consonant with a functional morpheme beginning with a consonant, it was a rule to write the surface form. However, the underlying form or intermediate forms in the process of derivation of the surface form could also be used. When an underlying form of a substantial word was phonologically conditioned, and if the substitution phenomenon was non-automatic or the surface form was a morphologically conditioned allomorphe of the underlying form, it was a rule to write the surface form. In the writing of a functional morpheme, however, the surface form was used as a rule whether the functional morpheme was phonologically or morphologically conditioned.
목차
Ⅰ. 논의의 방향
Ⅱ. 표기의 단위
Ⅲ. 표기의 특성
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
English Abstract
참고문헌 (36)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
형태단어와 음운단어
언어학 연구
2016 .04
-
한국어 다기능 형태소의 교수？학습 방법 연구
이중언어학
2007 .01
-
소위 복수기저형에 대한 재론
한국어학
2012 .08
-
國語의 音韻論的 單語 再考
어문연구(語文硏究)
2020 .01
-
공형태에 대하여
한국어학
2013 .02
-
형태소와 문법 기술
어문학
2010 .09
-
The difference between spoken and written language in modern Korean
언어학 연구
2008 .05
-
漢字語의 단어 형성의 특성에 대한 일고찰 : 名詞에 限하여
어문론집
2008 .03
-
Effects of Word-Writing in Contextual Word Learning on Korean High School Students’ L2 Vocabulary Learning
영어학
2019 .12
-
“VO1+O2”的类型和功能考察
외국학연구
2019 .01
-
음성 실현형 ‘–슴미–’와기저 구조 ‘–습–느–니––’
언어와 정보사회
2017 .01
-
2음절 한글표기 단어 시각적 어휘판단에서 음운표상의 역할
언어과학연구
2016 .12
-
The Stem Transposition Effects in Korean Word Recognition
언어과학
2019 .01
-
이해조 소설 <구마검>에 대한 음운론적 연구
한말연구
2017 .01
-
Korean EFL Learners’ Development of Inflectional Morphemes
언어학 연구
2017 .04
-
음운규칙 적용도와 단어빈도에 따른 단어 규칙성 효과의 차이
언어과학연구
2018 .09
-
한자 ‘기(氣)’로 끝난 단어들의 조어법 분석
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2019 .09
-
한국어 형태론, 넓고 깊게 보기- 최형용(2016)을 대상으로 -
언어사실과 관점
2016 .01
-
'이-' 후행 형태소의 문법 범주 - '나'와 '거나'를 중심으로 -
어문학
2005 .09
-
국어 음운현상과 형태소 경계에 관하여
언어학 연구
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-151-001731163