지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is to point out problems with the North Korean entries, proverb and idioms in 《The Standard Korean Dictionary》. 《The Standard Korean Dictionary》 defines 'the North Korean language' as 'entries missing from existing South Korean dictionaries among entries in North Korean 《The Chosun Language Dictionary》'.
However, many Chinese words and words concerned with custom have possibility of being included in the South Korean language, and many entries classified as the North Korean language is now being used as a technical terms in South Korea. Therefore, we need more careful and thorough classification. Also, the dictionary is explaining different language marking rules, for example 'ㅅ', between South Korea and North Korea as 'North Korean corresponding South Korean'. However, is technically, it should explain as 'North Korean language marking', but not the North Korean language because it's a problem of language marking rules.
Also, as for North Korean proverb and idioms, there are many proverb and idioms that are just slighty different in a way of suggesting method, so actually, they are hard to regard as different ones from South Korean proverb and idioms. For instance, 'a home left for a long time without person to take care of (South Korean saying)' and 'a house left without person to take care of (North Korean saying)' are not completely different proverb, but just a slightly different way of entering on the dictionary. In addition, I could find cases that some North Koreans are defined directly without corresponding South Korean word or explained as a part of North Korean saying or idiom, but actually those North Korean words are being used in South Korea too. 'Poverty breeds strife' is classified as North Korean language, but 'When poverty comes in at the door, love flies out of the window', 'Poverty breeds strife' are currently being used in South Korea, as well.
Like this, a number of North Korean entries, proverb and idioms in 《The Standard Korean Dictionary》 are classified as North Korean language without gong through a careful investigation on South Korean documents. As a result, the dictionary led to more confusion about the North Korean language. We need to examine documents more thoroughly and classify them as South Korean entries, proverb and idiom.
However, many Chinese words and words concerned with custom have possibility of being included in the South Korean language, and many entries classified as the North Korean language is now being used as a technical terms in South Korea. Therefore, we need more careful and thorough classification. Also, the dictionary is explaining different language marking rules, for example 'ㅅ', between South Korea and North Korea as 'North Korean corresponding South Korean'. However, is technically, it should explain as 'North Korean language marking', but not the North Korean language because it's a problem of language marking rules.
Also, as for North Korean proverb and idioms, there are many proverb and idioms that are just slighty different in a way of suggesting method, so actually, they are hard to regard as different ones from South Korean proverb and idioms. For instance, 'a home left for a long time without person to take care of (South Korean saying)' and 'a house left without person to take care of (North Korean saying)' are not completely different proverb, but just a slightly different way of entering on the dictionary. In addition, I could find cases that some North Koreans are defined directly without corresponding South Korean word or explained as a part of North Korean saying or idiom, but actually those North Korean words are being used in South Korea too. 'Poverty breeds strife' is classified as North Korean language, but 'When poverty comes in at the door, love flies out of the window', 'Poverty breeds strife' are currently being used in South Korea, as well.
Like this, a number of North Korean entries, proverb and idioms in 《The Standard Korean Dictionary》 are classified as North Korean language without gong through a careful investigation on South Korean documents. As a result, the dictionary led to more confusion about the North Korean language. We need to examine documents more thoroughly and classify them as South Korean entries, proverb and idiom.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 북한 표제어의 유형과 문제점
3. 북한 속담과 관용구
4. 맺음말
참고 문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『연세현대한국어대사전』(가칭)의 북한말 표제어 유형과 기술 방향 : 남북 언어의 접점을 찾아서
한국사전학
2005 .04
-
남북한 언어에 대한 비교 연구 : 발음과 어휘를 중심으로
국어문학
2003 .01
-
남북한 어휘의 이질화 양상
어문학
2004 .03
-
북한문학에 반영된 한국 현대사 연구 - 주요 역사적 사건을 통한 남북한 문학의 비교론적 관점을 중심으로 -
한국문학논총
2008 .01
-
North Korean Industry, 1946-1950
Korea Journal
2001 .12
-
Language Policies and their Effects in south and north Korea
언어
1980 .12
-
The Effectiveness of a Program to Train North Korean Teachers to Adjust to South Korean Society : Policy Implications for Supporting North Korean Escapees
Korea Journal
2015 .12
-
남북한과『역사비평』 : 25년의 성과와 방향
역사비평
2012 .08
-
『표준국어대사전』의 북한어 기술의 문제점과 개선 방향
한국사전학
2011 .10
-
The Political and Human Rights Issues Surrounding North Korean Defectors
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2006 .03
-
북한의 2013 개정 국어과 교육과정의 특징
국어교육연구
2016 .10
-
韓語飲食慣用語及其文化與認知分析
이중언어학
2019 .01
-
국어교육의 북한어 이해 교육에 대한 비판적 검토
국어교육연구
2015 .06
-
Whither the North Korean Nuclear Issue?
Korea Journal
2005 .12
-
남북한 언어에 대한 비교 연구 2 : 화술과 화법, 방송화법을 중심으로
국어문학
2004 .01
-
북한 6차 핵실험과 대외정책을 통해 본 남북한 교회교류 전망
신학과 목회
2017 .11
-
우리말 관용어의 상징 의미 연구 : 색채어를 대상으로
국어문학
2003 .01
-
속담을 활용한 다문화가정의 한국어/문화교육 방안 연구 - 한·중·일 속담의 비교를 중심으로
세계문학비교연구
2009 .01
-
북한과 중국의 미국식 인권개념에 대한 입장
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .06
-
국어사전에서의 속담 표제항 선정
한국사전학
2003 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-703-019486685