메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이윤석 (연세대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제32집
발행연도
2010.11
수록면
263 - 287 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Unlike most contracts, insurance contracts are said to be based on “utmost good faith” and one aspect of this is that the law imposes a duty on prospective policyholders to disclose all material facts. This was first laid down by Lord Mansfield C.J. in Carter v. Boehm, and his formulation of the disclosure duty is partially codified in the Marine Insurance Act 1906. This Marine Insurance Act 1906 requires a consumer to volunteer information to insurers. It is clearly important that insurers receive the information they need to assess risks because information from policyholders is often the basis of underwriting decisions on whether to accept risks at all, and if so, at what price and on what terms. However, it is now generally accepted that insurers should ask consumers for the information they want to know. Because the law needs to be updated to correspond to the realities of a mass consumer market, the 2009 [UK] Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Bill was published by the English and Scottish Law Commissions in December 2009. This draft Bill replaces the duty to volunteer information with a duty on consumers to take reasonable care to answer the insurer’s questions fully and accurately. And where a consumer makes a deliberate or reckless misrepresentation, the UK draft Bill permits the insurer to treat the contract as if it did not exist, and refuse all claims. But where the consumer answers questions carelessly, it provides the insurer with a proportionate remedy. The UK draft Bill would be a good model to us because the main problems are similar. Korean system on the duty of disclosure needs to be updated like the UK draft Bill.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 영국 해상보험법상 최대선의의무와 고지의무
Ⅲ. 영국 가계보험법 입법안
Ⅳ. 우리 보험법상 시사점-결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000490524