지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Minoda Muneki is a representative person who appeared negatively in cases involving academic freedom and intellectuals in Japan in the 1930s. At first, Minoda had become notorious in the Takigawa case in 1933. And the “Emperor Organ Theory” (J. Tenn?kikansetsu ) in 1935 and Tsuda S?kichi in 1939 made his name even more so. Minoda had checked the thought of liberal intellectuals and academic freedom from the shadows in these cases and sometimes in public.
It should also be noted that Minoda’s attacks were concentrated in the 1930s and focused on intellectuals and their scholarship. What resentments and thought structures were behind his attacks and acts?
First, it may be surmised that Minoda participated in the right-wing group Genri Nihonsha (Fundamental Japan Association) or believed in “The Art of Classical Japanese Poetry” (J. Shikishimanomichi ), and “The Way of the Gods” (J. Kannagaranomichi ). That is to say, his religion was “Japan.” And his passionate character should also be noted.
On the other hand, his private history should not be disregarded. That is, Minoda had bitterly criticized Morito Tatsuo in the Morito case, and he himself had become a target of criticism. Minoda’s complex toward the imperial universities may also be raised. This paper does not concentrate on “private” elucidation of Minoda’s resentment. But his private emotions toward the imperial universities, in that the persistence of this thought came from private human relations, cannot be avoided.
Finally, the mood in the 1930s should be mentioned. The 1930s may be treated as an emergency that required the unification of thought by “Japan” as one nation or Japanese “thought” for Japanese. Therefore, democracy, rationalism, individualism, and Marxism had to be eradicated “practically,” and Minoda assumed the main role in this.
It should also be noted that Minoda’s attacks were concentrated in the 1930s and focused on intellectuals and their scholarship. What resentments and thought structures were behind his attacks and acts?
First, it may be surmised that Minoda participated in the right-wing group Genri Nihonsha (Fundamental Japan Association) or believed in “The Art of Classical Japanese Poetry” (J. Shikishimanomichi ), and “The Way of the Gods” (J. Kannagaranomichi ). That is to say, his religion was “Japan.” And his passionate character should also be noted.
On the other hand, his private history should not be disregarded. That is, Minoda had bitterly criticized Morito Tatsuo in the Morito case, and he himself had become a target of criticism. Minoda’s complex toward the imperial universities may also be raised. This paper does not concentrate on “private” elucidation of Minoda’s resentment. But his private emotions toward the imperial universities, in that the persistence of this thought came from private human relations, cannot be avoided.
Finally, the mood in the 1930s should be mentioned. The 1930s may be treated as an emergency that required the unification of thought by “Japan” as one nation or Japanese “thought” for Japanese. Therefore, democracy, rationalism, individualism, and Marxism had to be eradicated “practically,” and Minoda assumed the main role in this.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 부정과 배제의 원형
Ⅲ. 신이 된 시인
Ⅳ. ‘원리일본사’와 ‘일본’
Ⅴ. 불령사상에 대한 성전과 광기
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
당국체제의 연쇄 : 동아시아 내전과 냉전
후지이 다케시
동북아역사논총
2014
.03
메이지 초년의 전쟁과 프로파간다 : 1874년 타이완[台灣] 침공 관련 이미지를 중심으로
박삼헌
동북아역사논총
2013
.12
니시키에[錦繪]를 통해서 본 근대천황상과 조선 멸시관의 형성
박진우
동북아역사논총
2013
.12
오르혼 옛 튀르크語 비문과 한반도인의 옛 이름 : 테긴 碑와 빌게 카간 碑에 나타나는 ‘Bökli’ 해석
김병호
동북아역사논총
2013
.12
吉田松陰의 대외관 : ‘敵體’와 팽창의 이중구조
박훈
동북아역사논총
2010
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0