지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第132輯
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 39 - 69 (31page)
- DOI
- 10.18622/kher.2014.12.132.39
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article studied how recent textbooks in three East Asian countries depicted and recorded historical efforts towards democracy，one of core agendas of political modernization and modernity. In order to do so, how each country defined and used the term ‘democracy’ was inspected and identified. Afterwards, how each textbook wrote about each of three countries’ various efforts to execute democratic policies was compared and contrasted.
Democracy of East Asian modern history has evolved from people’s power (民權)，democracy(民主), to new democracy(新民主). Democracy portrayed within the textbooks, however, often ignores such historical flow and fossilizes these processes to look like national movement history(Korea), revolution history(China), and imperial history (Japan). As a result, democratic movements and political practices gradual yet non-ceasing progress against all odds are hardly reflected in the textbooks. The Korean textbooks showed the strongest tendency, probably due to the political need to emphasize the movement to get back the nationality after the period of colonization under the Japanese regime. China and Korea also displayed strong under rating tendency towards realizing public virtue, the core value related to the true meaning of republics, despite the fact that both countries chose to be republics.
Under historical climates that surrounded three countries such as war, revolution, (anti) colonization and fascism, the relic of democracy in terms of not only movement and ideology but also institution is worth pondering.
Democracy of East Asian modern history has evolved from people’s power (民權)，democracy(民主), to new democracy(新民主). Democracy portrayed within the textbooks, however, often ignores such historical flow and fossilizes these processes to look like national movement history(Korea), revolution history(China), and imperial history (Japan). As a result, democratic movements and political practices gradual yet non-ceasing progress against all odds are hardly reflected in the textbooks. The Korean textbooks showed the strongest tendency, probably due to the political need to emphasize the movement to get back the nationality after the period of colonization under the Japanese regime. China and Korea also displayed strong under rating tendency towards realizing public virtue, the core value related to the true meaning of republics, despite the fact that both countries chose to be republics.
Under historical climates that surrounded three countries such as war, revolution, (anti) colonization and fascism, the relic of democracy in terms of not only movement and ideology but also institution is worth pondering.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 民權에서 民主로, 다시 新民主로: 용어와 개념
3. 운동사 · 혁명사 속의 민주공화: 한국과 중국
4. 제국사 속의 憲政과 정당정치: 일본
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-374-001022493