지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第132輯
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 291 - 323 (33page)
- DOI
- 10.18622/kher.2014.12.132.291
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The main focus of this paper is to examine the context, genealogy, background, and intention of the logic that is composed of discourses about the government-authorized Korean history textbook system.
The assertion that Korean history is separated from history education, as well as the purpose and content of the Korean History education are separately setting up and handling from general educational circles and purpose and tendency of history education has raised its voice supported by political authority. If the Korean history textbook publication system is changed to the government-authorized publication system, it will mean the same as a return to the October Yushin regime. Through several changes in the textbook policies, the Ministry of Education unilaterally overused modification orders and reinforced control and intervention. As a result, the officially certified Korean history textbook has been criticized for being highly distorted and similar to a government-authorized textbook. However, despite this fact, a return to the government-authorized textbook system should be prevented.
Through this paper, it is clear that discourses about the government-authorized Korean history textbook system has the historical significance of returning to the October Yushin regime and the enforcement of the government-authorized system signifies a regression to anti-democracy and a sense of destroying such an important concept. For these reasons, the history education circles create a united voice and oppose the government-authorized textbook system strongly.
The assertion that Korean history is separated from history education, as well as the purpose and content of the Korean History education are separately setting up and handling from general educational circles and purpose and tendency of history education has raised its voice supported by political authority. If the Korean history textbook publication system is changed to the government-authorized publication system, it will mean the same as a return to the October Yushin regime. Through several changes in the textbook policies, the Ministry of Education unilaterally overused modification orders and reinforced control and intervention. As a result, the officially certified Korean history textbook has been criticized for being highly distorted and similar to a government-authorized textbook. However, despite this fact, a return to the government-authorized textbook system should be prevented.
Through this paper, it is clear that discourses about the government-authorized Korean history textbook system has the historical significance of returning to the October Yushin regime and the enforcement of the government-authorized system signifies a regression to anti-democracy and a sense of destroying such an important concept. For these reasons, the history education circles create a united voice and oppose the government-authorized textbook system strongly.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 교과서 발행제의 開閉
3. 한국사 교과서 발행 국정화 담론
4. 국정화 담론을 통한 한국사의 분리·고립화
5. 국정화 담론 전파 · 확산의 메커니즘
6. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-374-001022564