지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As is often the case today, a number of Confucian ideas are misused, abused or left undone in Korea. The ideas of self-annihilation for the sake of one´s country (滅私奉公), and the principle of command and discipline(上命下服), well known among modern Koreans, were improvised Japanese-style terms dating from the Meiji Restoration. These ideas are not concepts recognized during the Chosun dynasty; nor are they original to Confucianism.
By examining misuses of the idea of ‘忠孝’ (loyalty and filial piety), this study argues that there are errors in the understanding and criticism of modern Koreans on Confucianism. This study also proposes that Confucius and Mencius have never asserted the commonly held equivalence between Confucianism and loyalty and filial piety. To Confucius, filial piety (孝) meant respect (敬) toward parents, not the obedience of children to parents. Similarly, loyalty meant being faithful to one’s duties, not obedience to power (monarch) or blind sacrifice for the country.
The initial usage of loyalty and filial piety as a concept was derived from Legalism (Hanbija (韓非子)). The 20th chapter of Hanbija is titled as “Loyalty and Filial Piety”, where the terms of ‘loyalty and filial piety’ appeared for the first time in an official document. The theory of loyalty and filial piety and the principle of command and discipline, which were derived from Hanbija, came to be accepted as the ruling ideology at the beginning of the Chinese Han Empire. Japan, in particular, is the country where the principle of command and discipline is equivalent to the theory of loyalty and filial piety. The idea of loyalty and filial piety became established as Samurai ethical principles during the Tokugawa period. This concept became institutionalized as the logic of militaristic fascism centered on the Japanese emperor. Therefore, the idea of loyalty and filial piety familiar to modern Koreans is not an original Confucian concept but is originated with Japanese imperialism during the colonial period, with its foundation on Legalism.
By examining misuses of the idea of ‘忠孝’ (loyalty and filial piety), this study argues that there are errors in the understanding and criticism of modern Koreans on Confucianism. This study also proposes that Confucius and Mencius have never asserted the commonly held equivalence between Confucianism and loyalty and filial piety. To Confucius, filial piety (孝) meant respect (敬) toward parents, not the obedience of children to parents. Similarly, loyalty meant being faithful to one’s duties, not obedience to power (monarch) or blind sacrifice for the country.
The initial usage of loyalty and filial piety as a concept was derived from Legalism (Hanbija (韓非子)). The 20th chapter of Hanbija is titled as “Loyalty and Filial Piety”, where the terms of ‘loyalty and filial piety’ appeared for the first time in an official document. The theory of loyalty and filial piety and the principle of command and discipline, which were derived from Hanbija, came to be accepted as the ruling ideology at the beginning of the Chinese Han Empire. Japan, in particular, is the country where the principle of command and discipline is equivalent to the theory of loyalty and filial piety. The idea of loyalty and filial piety became established as Samurai ethical principles during the Tokugawa period. This concept became institutionalized as the logic of militaristic fascism centered on the Japanese emperor. Therefore, the idea of loyalty and filial piety familiar to modern Koreans is not an original Confucian concept but is originated with Japanese imperialism during the colonial period, with its foundation on Legalism.
목차
1. 서론 : 현대 한국인의 유교 이미지
2. 근대 일본의 충효론
3. 한비자의 충효론
4. 공자의 충 · 효
5. 요약과 결론
참고문헌
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
도교 경전에 나타난 충효관 연구
대순사상논총
2023 .06
-
토픽모델링을 통해 본 조선왕조실록에 기록된 효의 실제
온지논총
2024 .07
-
『조선왕조실록』을 중심으로 본 효치
한국사상과 문화
2019 .01
-
충효사상의 한계와 비판적 재구성
한국사상과 문화
2018 .01
-
동북아의 가치인 공자의 효사상과 인성교육원리(1)
한국사상과 문화
2018 .01
-
여말선초 효행 기록의 변화
韓國史學史學報
2021 .01
-
『論語』에 나타난 孝行 考察
문화와 예술연구
2018 .01
-
율곡 효사상의 현대적 가치와 “동거계사”를 통한 세계적인 한국적 가정문화형성론
한국사상과 문화
2019 .01
-
독립국가연합(CIS) 유학생이 인식하는 효에 대한 연구
효학연구
2015 .01
-
효자전, 효와 불효의 사이 - 연산군의 행적을 중심으로 -
유학연구
2022 .05
-
한국인의 효의식과 효행의 과거 현재 미래
양명학
2021 .06
-
唐代 自律的 孝實踐과 ‘奪情’
대구사학
2015 .01
-
『논어』「학이」편을 통한 공자에 대한 평가
인문과 예술
2017 .12
-
효의 역사적 변용과 성별화된 효 -여사서를 중심으로-
유학연구
2024 .02
-
붓다영화 〈석가모니〉에 관한 연구
종교문화연구
2018 .06
-
효자전, 감성과 이성의 사이 - 조선 초 효관련 정책을 중심으로 -
유학연구
2021 .01
-
효행장려 및 지원에 관한 법률과 인성교육진흥법 시행의 추이 탐색
효학연구
2015 .01
-
유교 孝 문화 관점에서 본 고령화 사회 부모 봉양에 관한 연구
효학연구
2022 .06
-
대순진리회의 효 윤리에 나타난 종교성 연구
대순사상논총
2016 .12
-
고려 『효행록』과 세종조 『삼강행실효자도』 비교 연구
한국사상과 문화
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-000-001808030