지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objective: The aim of this study is to suggest some improvement ideas based on the validity and the reliability analyses of the current safety culture measurement method applied to the Korean nuclear power industry.
Background: Wrong safety culture is known as one of the major causes of the disasters such as the space shuttle Columbia disaster or the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident. Assessment of safety culture of an organization is important to build a safer organizational environment as well as to identify the risks hidden in the organization.
Method: A face validity of the current safety culture measurement method was analyzed by comparison of the key factors of safety culture in the Korean nuclear power industry with those factors reviewed in the previous studies. The current interview method was analyzed to identify the problems which degrade the consistency of evaluation.
Results: Most safety culture factors reviewed in the literatures are covered in the list of the Korean nuclear power industry safety culture factors. However the unstructured questions used in the interview may result in inconsistency of safety culture evaluation among interviewers.
Conclusion: This study suggests some examples which might improve the consistency of interviewers" evaluation on safety culture such as a post interview evaluation form.
Application: An extended post interview evaluation form might help to increase the accuracy of the interviewing method for Korean nuclear industry safety culture evaluation.
Background: Wrong safety culture is known as one of the major causes of the disasters such as the space shuttle Columbia disaster or the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident. Assessment of safety culture of an organization is important to build a safer organizational environment as well as to identify the risks hidden in the organization.
Method: A face validity of the current safety culture measurement method was analyzed by comparison of the key factors of safety culture in the Korean nuclear power industry with those factors reviewed in the previous studies. The current interview method was analyzed to identify the problems which degrade the consistency of evaluation.
Results: Most safety culture factors reviewed in the literatures are covered in the list of the Korean nuclear power industry safety culture factors. However the unstructured questions used in the interview may result in inconsistency of safety culture evaluation among interviewers.
Conclusion: This study suggests some examples which might improve the consistency of interviewers" evaluation on safety culture such as a post interview evaluation form.
Application: An extended post interview evaluation form might help to increase the accuracy of the interviewing method for Korean nuclear industry safety culture evaluation.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Face Validity of the KNISCF
3. Reliability of the Interview Method using the KNISCF
4. Results and Conclusions
References
참고문헌 (12)
참고문헌 신청
Ball, P.W. and Scotney, V., Approaches to Safety Culture Enhancement, Daresbury, U.K., British Nuclear Fuels, Ltd., 1998.
Hale, A. and Hovden, J., Management and Culture: the Third Age of Safety. A Review of Approaches to Organizational Aspects of Safety, Health, and Environment. In A. Feyer and A. Williamson (Eds.), Occupational Injury: Risk Prevention, and Intervention, Taylor & Francis, London, 129-166, 1998.
Health and Safety Executive (HSE), A Review of the Safety Culture and Safety Climate Literature for the Development of the Safety Culture Toolkit, HSE Research Report 367, London, HSE Books, 2005.
KHNP-CRI, Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment Report for Hanul Nuclear Power Plant 3, Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co., 2013.
KHNP-CRI, Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment Report for Hanul Nuclear Power Plant 2, Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co., 2015.
Hale, A. and Hovden, J., Management and Culture: the Third Age of Safety. A Review of Approaches to Organizational Aspects of Safety, Health, and Environment. In A. Feyer and A. Williamson (Eds.), Occupational Injury: Risk Prevention, and Intervention, Taylor & Francis, London, 129-166, 1998.
Health and Safety Executive (HSE), A Review of the Safety Culture and Safety Climate Literature for the Development of the Safety Culture Toolkit, HSE Research Report 367, London, HSE Books, 2005.
KHNP-CRI, Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment Report for Hanul Nuclear Power Plant 3, Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co., 2013.
KHNP-CRI, Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment Report for Hanul Nuclear Power Plant 2, Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co., 2015.
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Current Status and Issues of Nuclear Safety Culture
대한인간공학회지
2016 .08
-
Development Requirements of Indicators to monitor Nuclear Safety Culture
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .10
-
A Methodology for Establishment of Safety Culture in Industry through Global Company Practices
대한인간공학회지
2016 .04
-
안전패러다임 전환에(Safety-Ⅱ) 따른 기업안전문화 평가 기법연구
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2020 .10
-
국내 철도운영기관 철도안전문화수준 조사
한국도시철도학회논문집
2015 .09
-
조직의 안전행동에 따른 연구원의 안전의식 수준 및 안전문화 향상정도에 관한 연구
한국안전학회지
2015 .01
-
안전문화 향상 및 사고 예방을 위한 안전문화 측정시스템 구축
한국가스학회 학술대회논문집
2022 .05
-
동일업종 그룹 계열사의 사업장 규모 및 작업형태별 안전문화 특성연구
한국안전학회지
2017 .01
-
Safety-II 개념에 기반한 성공사례 분석과 안전문화 모범관행의 도출
대한인간공학회지
2020 .08
-
원전 이벤트 원인분석 과정에서의 원자력 안전문화 검토
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2022 .10
-
Measuring Safety Culture to Promote Aviation Safety Culture
대한인간공학회지
2016 .04
-
Regulatory Oversight of Nuclear Safety Culture and the Validation Study on the Oversight Model Components
대한인간공학회지
2016 .08
-
원자력 안전문화의 정량화 방법론 개발
한국안전학회지
2015 .01
-
안전프로그램(Safety Program) 및 안전문화(Safety Culture)에 대한 조사
한국항공운항학회지
2019 .01
-
안전문화 평가방안 연구
한국안전학회지
2016 .01
-
원전의 원자력 안전문화 평가 방법 개선
한국에너지학회 학술발표회
2023 .10
-
Significance of Systematic Approach Strategy to Safety Culture in Reference to Investigation of Operating Performance Information for Nuclear Power Plants
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2020 .10
-
합성곱신경망을 이용한 안전문화 수준 분류
대한인간공학회지
2019 .12
-
Safety Culture, A New Challenge to Human Factors Engineering for 21st Century
대한인간공학회지
2016 .12
-
An Research Into The Reactive Safety Action Program for Promoting Aviation Safety Culture
대한인간공학회지
2016 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-530-002902890