메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
마정근 (한양대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제27권 제4집 (통권 제56집)
발행연도
2016.11
수록면
167 - 199 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Due to the execution of “The Improper Solicitation and Graft Act” are quite a few changes that are occurring in the economic life of the people and the market. These changes will have a negative also be positive.
It is worrisome that a burning candle is ridiculous results bedbugs japeuryeoda incest can be caused. We are sure to remember “Don’t as throw the baby out with the bathwater.” Especially when the economy is in the economic downturn in the wrong factors or pay a price to return it and can only be restored to the previous level. The nation is now shrinking factor in a market suffering from long-term recession will be avoided as much as possible. Negative effects of the market downturn and the act can be a positive social effect transparency in public office.
Education institutions targeting the belonging configuration in order to avoid confusion over the enforcement of the current act, as well as illegal solicitation is being conducted also a variety of education for the public. However, including the media, which is found to be a serious misunderstanding of the act, even above the interests authoritative interpretation organization, the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission. Meanwhile. Many ordinary citizens not engaged in public service know they are not good at hitting is not subject to the applicable act. And for those who think themselves the subjects of applicable act, unlike the contents of this Act it shall also contracted a life too.
On the other hand, there is a authoritative interpretation agency and the judiciary do not show a difference of opinion conflict or less in part related to the interpretation and application of act standards initiative characters are confused whether to comply with certain criteria and weighting.
This paper is the first ‘subject of application’ and ‘duties related requirement’ that the essential requirements of the many controversial points of The Improper Solicitation and Graft Act, and second, ‘gifts, etc.’ and follows centered on the concepts such as ‘social normal usages’ It proposed to derive the same key improvements.
First, the Prohibition of Acceptance of Financial or other Advantages are unified by then incorporated into the Criminal Code.
Second, and except for the media and private schools involved in applied subjects.
Third, all of the provisions that can be punished in the duties unrelated official should be deleted.
Fourth, get rid of the Restriction of Acceptance of Honoraria for Outside Lectures or Relevant Activities. Otherwise, the current act and regulations as it shall be the “as the public official or relevant person’s the abuse behavior, they accept the reward money related to his or her duties or requested due to de facto influence arising from his or her position or responsibilities in the outside lecture or relevant activity” only applies to, and the upper limit of reward of the outside lecture or relevant activity should be eliminated entirely.
Sixth, it should also be punished in violation of the act of a foreign country.
Seventh, the requirement for the prohibition of illegal appeal should be defined as a request for illegal or unfair economic gain from the beginning.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 부정청탁법의 주요 적용 방식 및 성립 요건
Ⅲ. 적용대상자
Ⅳ. 문제점 및 개선 방안
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 연관된 판례 (4)

  • 대법원 2014. 1. 23. 선고 2013도11735 판결

    사립학교법 제20조 제1항, 제2항, 제20조의2, 제20조의3, 제28조 제1항, 제47조, 제73조 제2호의 내용과 취지 등을 종합적으로 고려하여 보면, 학교법인 운영권의 유상 양도를 금지·처벌하는 입법자의 명시적 결단이 없는 이상 학교법인 운영권의 양도 및 그 양도대금의 수수 등으로 인하여 향후 학교법인의 기본재산에 악영향을 미칠 수 있다거나 학교법

    자세히 보기
  • 헌법재판소 2009. 3. 17. 선고 2009헌바32 결정

    자세히 보기
  • 대법원 1990. 11. 23. 선고 90다카3659 판결

    가. 국가나 지방자치단체도 사경제의 주체로서 타인과 거래행위를 하는 경우에는 그 범위 내에서 독점규제및공정거래에관한법률(1990.1.13. 법률 제4198호로 개정되기 전의 것) 소정의 사업자에 포함된다고 보아야 한다.

    자세히 보기
  • 서울고등법원 2008. 12. 18. 선고 2007누29842 판결

    자세히 보기

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-360-001877534