지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is the general belief that the capital city of Goguryeo was a combination of a mountain fortress and a fortress constructed on plain ground. However, whether or not Goguryeo had such capital city or a system of that sort from the very beginning, or during its state-formation period, is yet to be determined. In order to determine when the Goguryeo capital city system was materially established, we shall first examine why the issue itself had never received adequate attention before.
So, tracked in this article is how the notion of a Goguryeo capital city system originated in the first place, and evolved over the years. At first, during the Japanese occupation period it was the Japanese scholars who exclusively led the studies on the Goguryeo dynasty’s “Doseong” Capital city. Sekino Tadashi in the 1910s suggested for the first time the aforementioned ‘Mountain fortress/Plain fortress’ combination as the characteristic of the Goguryeo capital city system, but there was an undercurrent to that notion, which viewed the Goguryeo capital city (as well as other Korean ancient capital cities in general) as crude and underdeveloped. He viewed the ‘plain fortress’ part as a ‘palace’ rather than a fortress, and argued that Korean ancient capitals lacked the capacity of protecting the people. His such interpretation was inherited by scholars in subsequent periods, and was even renewed by Chinese scholars in the 1980s. In the so-called “Northeast Research Project” the plain fortress of the Goguryeo capital city system was viewed as a recycled version of the old Han commandery facility. According to such perspective, the Goguryeo capital city system, characterized as a combination of both mountain and plain area fortresses, was understood as a system that was established during the time of the Goguryeo state’s formation. Ironically, that kind of understanding effectively rendered further discussion of the exact time point of the capital city system’s actual emergence a seemingly lesser priority. And a fairly low view of Goguryeo and the formation of the Goguryeo state continued to be perpetuated as a result.
So, tracked in this article is how the notion of a Goguryeo capital city system originated in the first place, and evolved over the years. At first, during the Japanese occupation period it was the Japanese scholars who exclusively led the studies on the Goguryeo dynasty’s “Doseong” Capital city. Sekino Tadashi in the 1910s suggested for the first time the aforementioned ‘Mountain fortress/Plain fortress’ combination as the characteristic of the Goguryeo capital city system, but there was an undercurrent to that notion, which viewed the Goguryeo capital city (as well as other Korean ancient capital cities in general) as crude and underdeveloped. He viewed the ‘plain fortress’ part as a ‘palace’ rather than a fortress, and argued that Korean ancient capitals lacked the capacity of protecting the people. His such interpretation was inherited by scholars in subsequent periods, and was even renewed by Chinese scholars in the 1980s. In the so-called “Northeast Research Project” the plain fortress of the Goguryeo capital city system was viewed as a recycled version of the old Han commandery facility. According to such perspective, the Goguryeo capital city system, characterized as a combination of both mountain and plain area fortresses, was understood as a system that was established during the time of the Goguryeo state’s formation. Ironically, that kind of understanding effectively rendered further discussion of the exact time point of the capital city system’s actual emergence a seemingly lesser priority. And a fairly low view of Goguryeo and the formation of the Goguryeo state continued to be perpetuated as a result.
목차
머리말
1. 1910년대 고구려 ‘도성제’론의 출발
2. 세키노 다다시(關野貞)식 한국 고대 ‘도성제’론의 함의
3. 1980년대 이후 고구려 ‘도성제’론의 재전유
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (62)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Reconsideration of the Goguryeo Capital System
Korea Journal
2025 .03
-
고구려 도시 연구 試論
사림
2022 .10
-
고구려 ‘남평양(南平壤)’ 위치와 변천에 대한 검토
전북사학
2022 .11
-
고구려 도성 경관의 형성과 지배 권력의 추이
한국고대사연구
2019 .09
-
한국 고대사에서 왕도(王都)와 도성(都城)의 개념 : 고구려의 용례를 중심으로
역사와현실
2017 .06
-
요동지역 고구려성의 입지와 공간분석
한국고고학보
2023 .06
-
고구려와 북조의 조공관계 성격
한국사학보
2019 .05
-
조선 전기의 고구려 초기 都城 위치 비정과 그 실상
사림
2015 .01
-
광개토왕릉비 영락10년조에 나타난 고구려의 군사 활동과 외교관계
목간과문자
2023 .06
-
Goguryeo’s Orientation Toward the Material Culture of the Han Period (漢代): A Preliminary Discussion
Korea Journal
2023 .09
-
遭遇와 衝突로 高句麗 後期를 이해하다 -김진한, 2020, 『고구려 후기 대외관계사 연구』-
선사와 고대
2021 .01
-
가야 諸國과 고구려의 관계
한국고대사연구
2020 .06
-
고구려 국내성 및 환도성 위치 연구
인문과학연구
2020 .06
-
고구려 王都, 王畿의 형성 과정과 성격
한국고대사연구
2016 .03
-
충주고구려비를 통해 본 5세기 중반 고구려와 신라와의 관계
고구려발해연구
2019 .11
-
前燕 속의 ‘高句麗系 流民’
이화사학연구
2021 .12
-
7세기 중엽 국제정세 변동과 고구려 대외관계의 추이
대구사학
2018 .01
-
고구려 진파리1호분 연구
역사와현실
2015 .03
-
사료로 본 3명의 고구려 여성 이민 사적에 관한 고찰
영남학
2022 .06
-
고등학교 『한국사』 교과서의高句麗 滅亡期 및 復興運動 서술 분석과 제안
역사교육논집
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-911-002059339