지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Previous works on Joseon’s foreign relations have focused on Joseon’s response to the Ming-Qing transition. In the course, the year of 1637, when the Qing dynasty subjugated Joseon, was regarded as a turning point. However, the Ming dynasty had not perished until 1644, and unofficial contacts between Joseon and the Ming dynasty through the smuggling route across the Yellow Sea continued even after their official relationship was cut off.
Secret contacts between Joseon and the Ming dynasty can be divided into three phases. During the first phase(1637-1638), Ming admiral Chen Hongfan(陳洪範) tried to appease Joseon in order to get Joseon’s cooperation on his attempt to construct a new military base on the Yellow Sea, which would replace destroyed Dongjiangzhen(東江鎭) Garrison on Gado(椵島) Island. The Joseon court appreciated his sympathy for Joseon’s difficult situation, but denied his demands and rejected future contacts from him. For the second phase(1638-1640), the Qing dynasty ordered Joseon to send its troops to attack Ming territory. In response, Joseon sent the monk Dokbo(獨步) as a secret envoy to Ming to inform that Joseon inevitably had to send soldiers for Qing’s aid. The third phase(1640-1644) was composed of two sub-phase. From 1640 to 1642, Ming dispatched its navy to Joseon for three times to gain Joseon’s military support. Joseon ostensibly welcomed Ming officials but rejected any urge of military cooperation. From 1642 to 1644, the Qing dynasty noticed the secretive contacts and cracked down on Joseon. Meanwhile, the agents of secret contacts got arrested and removed from power in both countries. Thereafter, secretive contacts between the two countries were cut off to the end of the Ming dynasty.
While secretive contacts with Joseon was just a diplomatic and military choice to Ming, for Joseon they were an ideological way to practice its moral obligation to the Ming dynasty(對明義理) and a realistic policy to guarantee its survival in unpredictable chaos of the war between Ming and Qing. Ming’s goal was to acquire Joseon’s military support, whereas Joseon only wanted the Ming dynasty to understand its inevitable situation. Thus, secret contacts between the two states naturally ended in vain.
Meanwhile, secretive contacts between Joseon and the Ming dynasty made possible by smuggling network across the Yellow Sea. In the process, the will of the two central governments had to be filtered and distorted by the agents with their own personal and economic aims. As a result, their participation affected the course of the secretive contacts.
Secret contacts between Joseon and the Ming dynasty can be divided into three phases. During the first phase(1637-1638), Ming admiral Chen Hongfan(陳洪範) tried to appease Joseon in order to get Joseon’s cooperation on his attempt to construct a new military base on the Yellow Sea, which would replace destroyed Dongjiangzhen(東江鎭) Garrison on Gado(椵島) Island. The Joseon court appreciated his sympathy for Joseon’s difficult situation, but denied his demands and rejected future contacts from him. For the second phase(1638-1640), the Qing dynasty ordered Joseon to send its troops to attack Ming territory. In response, Joseon sent the monk Dokbo(獨步) as a secret envoy to Ming to inform that Joseon inevitably had to send soldiers for Qing’s aid. The third phase(1640-1644) was composed of two sub-phase. From 1640 to 1642, Ming dispatched its navy to Joseon for three times to gain Joseon’s military support. Joseon ostensibly welcomed Ming officials but rejected any urge of military cooperation. From 1642 to 1644, the Qing dynasty noticed the secretive contacts and cracked down on Joseon. Meanwhile, the agents of secret contacts got arrested and removed from power in both countries. Thereafter, secretive contacts between the two countries were cut off to the end of the Ming dynasty.
While secretive contacts with Joseon was just a diplomatic and military choice to Ming, for Joseon they were an ideological way to practice its moral obligation to the Ming dynasty(對明義理) and a realistic policy to guarantee its survival in unpredictable chaos of the war between Ming and Qing. Ming’s goal was to acquire Joseon’s military support, whereas Joseon only wanted the Ming dynasty to understand its inevitable situation. Thus, secret contacts between the two states naturally ended in vain.
Meanwhile, secretive contacts between Joseon and the Ming dynasty made possible by smuggling network across the Yellow Sea. In the process, the will of the two central governments had to be filtered and distorted by the agents with their own personal and economic aims. As a result, their participation affected the course of the secretive contacts.
#병자호란
#명청교체
#비밀접촉
#東江鎭
#인조
#최명길
#임경업
#獨步
#대명의리
#漢船
#밀무역
#The Second Manchu Invasion of Joseon in 1637(丙子胡亂)
#Ming-Qing Transition
#Secret Contacts
#Dongjiangzhen(東江鎭) Garrison
#King Injo
#Choi Myunggil(崔鳴吉)
#Im Gyeong-up(林慶業)
#Monk Dokbo(獨步)
#Moral Obligation to the Ming Dynasty(對明義理)
#Chinese Ships(漢船)
#Smuggling
목차
1. 머리말
2. 조명관계의 단절과 명군의 對 조선 접촉
3. 조선의 밀사 파견과 명의 연합 작전 구상
4. 조명 비밀접촉의 배경과 의도
5. 맺음말
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (64)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
적대국·동맹국 게임을 통한 병자호란 발발 원인 재해석
한국군사학논집
2020 .06
-
朝鮮士大夫筆下的明朝佛教與社會文化 — 以『漂海錄』和『錦溪日記』為中心的考察
중국연구
2019 .01
-
명청시기와 조선시기 중앙관청 간에 비교 고찰 - 공간배치 및 역사연혁을 중심으로
서울학연구
2022 .05
-
关于韩国独创的行政价值的考察 - 在15世纪中国明朝影响下的朝鲜王朝 -
한중사회과학연구
2016 .01
-
17세기 朝ㆍ淸관계와 ‘倭情’의 군사ㆍ외교적 활용
군사
2015 .03
-
음식이 조선왕들의 질병과 사망에 미친 영향에 관한 연구 (조선전기: 태조~성종)
한국외식산업학회지
2020 .06
-
Moving Beyond Politics: Western Scholarship on Joseon
Korea Journal
2021 .09
-
‘晚明文学’與‘王学’的关係论之再认识
중국학논총
2017 .01
-
Korea/Culture as the Chosen Photographic Object: Focusing on Culture Joseon
Korea Journal
2015 .01
-
明代文人들의 書齋文化考察
동북아 문화연구
2023 .09
-
자율-안보 교환 모델을 통해 본 임진왜란 시기 조·명 연합수군의 해전 수행 연구
한국군사학논총
2023 .06
-
식민지 조선영화 속 실존 인물의 표상: 1940년대 초 상영된 현존 극영화를 중심으로
동북아연구(구 통일문제연구)
2018 .01
-
『유경록』으로 보는 조선 후기 관찰사에 의한 살사(殺死)사건 처리 실태
법학연구
2022 .06
-
清華簡《厚父》疏證
중국학보
2017 .01
-
건륭연간 외교 공간의 확장과 조선 사신의 교류 -조선·청 지식 교류의 기반에 관하여-
한국학논총
2019 .01
-
일제강점기 잡지에 내재된 식민지 조선인식 ‒모던일본 조선판(モダン日本 朝鮮版)과재조일본인의 조선인식을 중심으로‒
일본근대학연구
2019 .01
-
≪西域行程記≫와 明初의 西域
중국학논총
2019 .01
-
정체성이라는 전략: 조선후기 대명유민의 경우를 중심으로
통일과 평화
2022 .12
-
조선시대 벽제관의 군사, 외교적 의미
군사
2018 .03
-
남조선(南朝鮮)신앙의 성립과 전개
충청문화연구
2019 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-390-000972827