지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There has been different traditions in analysing Korean sentences in terms of information structure, and the basic terms of a name have been used differently depending on the different assumptions about their syntactic statuses. In this paper, I offer a perspective of viewing information structure as formal phenomena in the level of discourse and thus define the basic terms of information structure in Korean systematically.
On the other hand, information units in a sentence have their own information statuses in their textual or situational contexts. In this research, I review the preceding approaches of similar perspectives and reclassify the expressional instantiations of the Korean information units. In this approach, I argue that in analysing sentences in terms of information structure it is desirable to see them function as constraints to the information structure in general, because they are not encoded formally and affect distributional realizations of topic and focus separately.
On the basis of the system above, I discuss the four issues in demarcating the border between information units in Korean: the linguistic encoding of topic and focus each, interactions between the scope of information structure, which is the same as the one of speech act, and the ones of other functional categories, and lastly, the interrelation between the case-markers ellipsis and focus realization.
Meanwhile, I suggested that, firstly, the ratified topic in Korean can be realized only by word order without the topic marker neun, secondly, neun-marked nominals preceding a verb can be interpreted as an event topic, together with the verb as a whole and it has [+verum] feature as its matching focus unseen. Thirdly, I showed that the scopes of foci separate them from the presuppositions of the utterances they are in and, therefore, the semantic interpretation of each sentence should be interpreted as the dynamic conjointness of its presupposition and its assertion(the speech act). Finally, I made a counterargument to the pervasive idea that case-markers in Korean mark focus and pointed out that we need to see the same data with a different angle, that is to say, the case-markers within a focus is difficult to be omitted.
On the other hand, information units in a sentence have their own information statuses in their textual or situational contexts. In this research, I review the preceding approaches of similar perspectives and reclassify the expressional instantiations of the Korean information units. In this approach, I argue that in analysing sentences in terms of information structure it is desirable to see them function as constraints to the information structure in general, because they are not encoded formally and affect distributional realizations of topic and focus separately.
On the basis of the system above, I discuss the four issues in demarcating the border between information units in Korean: the linguistic encoding of topic and focus each, interactions between the scope of information structure, which is the same as the one of speech act, and the ones of other functional categories, and lastly, the interrelation between the case-markers ellipsis and focus realization.
Meanwhile, I suggested that, firstly, the ratified topic in Korean can be realized only by word order without the topic marker neun, secondly, neun-marked nominals preceding a verb can be interpreted as an event topic, together with the verb as a whole and it has [+verum] feature as its matching focus unseen. Thirdly, I showed that the scopes of foci separate them from the presuppositions of the utterances they are in and, therefore, the semantic interpretation of each sentence should be interpreted as the dynamic conjointness of its presupposition and its assertion(the speech act). Finally, I made a counterargument to the pervasive idea that case-markers in Korean mark focus and pointed out that we need to see the same data with a different angle, that is to say, the case-markers within a focus is difficult to be omitted.
목차
1. 들어가기
2. 한국어 정보구조의 기본 형식과 제약
3. 정보단위 획정의 실제
4. 나가기
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (47)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김민국 / 2016 / 한국어의 격조사와 초점 - 주격과 대격을 중심으로 - / 國語學 (78) : 165 ~ 219
[단행본] - 남기심 / 2001 / 현대국어 통사론 / 태학사
[학위논문] - 박철우 / 1998 / 한국어 정보구조에서의 화제와 초점 / 박사 / 서울大學校 大學院
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 박철우 / 2007 / 국어 분리 구성의 형식과 기능 / 언어학 (49) : 211 ~ 233
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 박철우 / 2013 / 부정의 작용역에 대하여 / 한국어학 61 : 145 ~ 171
[단행본] - 남기심 / 2001 / 현대국어 통사론 / 태학사
[학위논문] - 박철우 / 1998 / 한국어 정보구조에서의 화제와 초점 / 박사 / 서울大學校 大學院
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 박철우 / 2007 / 국어 분리 구성의 형식과 기능 / 언어학 (49) : 211 ~ 233
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 박철우 / 2013 / 부정의 작용역에 대하여 / 한국어학 61 : 145 ~ 171
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국어 정보구조표지 ‘은/는’의 의미 - 대조 의미를 중심으로
언어학
2019 .12
-
한국어 정보구조와 사용역
언어학
2017 .08
-
고대 중국어의 초점 유형 및 초점 표현 방식
중국어문학
2022 .04
-
助詞 ‘-은/는’과 構文構造
어문연구(語文硏究)
2021 .09
-
焦點標記詞 ‘連’의 품사 고찰
중국어문학논집
2020 .06
-
한국어 정보 구조에 대한 학습자 인식 고찰 - 이유 표현 인터뷰 내용을 중심으로 -
언어학
2024 .12
-
信息结构理论视野下汉韩反预期副词语义对比研究
중국학
2021 .09
-
한국어 주격표지, 격표지의 생략, 초점, 그리고 화제
언어학
2021 .12
-
생략과 관련된 정보구조의 몇 가지 문제들에 대하여
언어와 정보사회
2017 .07
-
Information structure, topic predictability and gradients in Korean case ellipsis: A probabilistic account
언어연구
2015 .01
-
정보 구조와 운율 구조의 상호작용에 관한 연구
어문론집
2018 .09
-
A Corpus-based analysis of the usage of Korean markers ?(n)un and -i/ka in editorial texts
언어와 정보
2015 .12
-
Syntactic analysis on Information Structure
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2020 .10
-
불한번역과 주어
언어와 정보사회
2018 .01
-
한국어와 정보구조 -적용상의 쟁점을 중심으로-
한국어학
2021 .05
-
문화유산 정보 제공의 현황과 정보의 ‘연결’ 방안 모색
인문콘텐츠
2019 .09
-
구정보, 신정보란 무엇인가 -신구성의 구별과 정보구조적 조정-
한국어학
2021 .05
-
A Data-based Analysis of Topic Continuity and Information Status in English
언어학 연구
2018 .07
-
국어의 생략 현상에 대하여Ⅰ
언어와 정보사회
2019 .01
-
Nakagawa, Information Structure in Spoken Japanese: Particles, Word Order, and Intonation (2020)에 대한 검토
형태론
2022 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-710-001250342