지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.6
- 수록면
- 27 - 58 (32page)
- DOI
- 10.29323/mchina.2018.6.78.27
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The article aimed to focus on the significance of the discourse of controlled economy that had been popular over the intellectual milieu of China in 1930s. The article pursued to overview the intellectual trend in that period, in particular, investigate various moments and points for its emergence within the context of the perception of modernization.
In 1930s the world encountered a great deal of demand for the reformation of capitalism, which was closely connected to the formation and the spread of the discourse of controlled economy in China. The contrast between the crisis of the Great Depression by the United States of America and the celebration of the Five-year plan by the Soviet Union defined the characteristic of the discourse of controlled economy in China as contemporary reaction. The foundation of the Nanjing Government strongly involved in the formation of the discourse. The political circumstances since introduction of the government and the outbreak of the Manchurian Affair further complicated the discourse. The Principle of People’s Livelihood, a prototype of the Chinese non-capitalist modernization, played a significant role for the discourse of controlled economy to broaden its ideological scope by its being converged with the discourse, and the practice of Principle itself also became expanded and deepened by it.
The article particularly emphasized that the discourse of controlled economy enabled related discussions for a subjective pathway to the modernization of China grounded upon the periodic circumstance of 1930s. Here, I argued that the implication for the discourse of controlled economy lay in the fact that it sparked the alteration of the discourse of modernization itself. Such qualitative change in perception further conditioned the intellectual trend in 1940s along with non-capitalist scope. There are three connected clues in terms of the acceptance to the discourse of controlled economy: First, the socialist perspective in Chinese intellectual milieu was rather gradually underscored via the structure of the discourse of controlled economy. Second, there had been formed a wide agreement with mixed economy as a result of subjective acceptance of the discourse. Three, there occurred politico-intellectual divergence according to the subjects, and accelerated the political changes in 1940s. The discourse of controlled economy in China not only reveal the intellectual significance of 1930s, but it also allow us to glimpse the characteristic of the Chinese Revolution in the twentieth century. More studies on the topic are anticipated.
In 1930s the world encountered a great deal of demand for the reformation of capitalism, which was closely connected to the formation and the spread of the discourse of controlled economy in China. The contrast between the crisis of the Great Depression by the United States of America and the celebration of the Five-year plan by the Soviet Union defined the characteristic of the discourse of controlled economy in China as contemporary reaction. The foundation of the Nanjing Government strongly involved in the formation of the discourse. The political circumstances since introduction of the government and the outbreak of the Manchurian Affair further complicated the discourse. The Principle of People’s Livelihood, a prototype of the Chinese non-capitalist modernization, played a significant role for the discourse of controlled economy to broaden its ideological scope by its being converged with the discourse, and the practice of Principle itself also became expanded and deepened by it.
The article particularly emphasized that the discourse of controlled economy enabled related discussions for a subjective pathway to the modernization of China grounded upon the periodic circumstance of 1930s. Here, I argued that the implication for the discourse of controlled economy lay in the fact that it sparked the alteration of the discourse of modernization itself. Such qualitative change in perception further conditioned the intellectual trend in 1940s along with non-capitalist scope. There are three connected clues in terms of the acceptance to the discourse of controlled economy: First, the socialist perspective in Chinese intellectual milieu was rather gradually underscored via the structure of the discourse of controlled economy. Second, there had been formed a wide agreement with mixed economy as a result of subjective acceptance of the discourse. Three, there occurred politico-intellectual divergence according to the subjects, and accelerated the political changes in 1940s. The discourse of controlled economy in China not only reveal the intellectual significance of 1930s, but it also allow us to glimpse the characteristic of the Chinese Revolution in the twentieth century. More studies on the topic are anticipated.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 1930년대 근대화론과 통제경제론의 영향
Ⅲ. 통제경제론의 논의 지형
Ⅳ. 통제경제론과 민생주의
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (88)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국 사회언어학에서의 담화분석 연구
사회언어학
2020 .01
-
‘統制經濟’와 ‘計劃經濟’의 교차와 길항 –1930년대 중국 統制經濟論의 개념화–
중국사연구
2020 .01
-
언어를 들여다보는 렌즈로서의 담화
언어학
2020 .12
-
중국어 담화표지어 유형 및 중한 대조 연구
담화와인지
2016 .02
-
담화 단위와 의미
한국어학
2017 .11
-
영어와 한국어의 담화 맥락구조에 대한 연구
영어영문학
2021 .02
-
중?한 일기예보 텍스트의 완성 조건 대조 연구
중국언어연구
2020 .01
-
조선어학회 사건 관련 언어 민족주의 담론 분석
언어사실과 관점
2017 .01
-
한중 담화표지 대조연구 : 개념과 특징을 중심으로
언어학 연구
2018 .07
-
루쉰魯迅의 중국 고대소설 연구 4— 일본 학자 시오노야 온鹽谷溫과의 학문적 교류
중국소설논총
2021 .08
-
고등학교 중국어 교과서에 나타난 담화표지어 분석
중국어문학논집
2016 .08
-
한국어 담화표지 연구의 현황과 과제
한말연구
2017 .01
-
TV 홈쇼핑 담화 속 담화표지 '자'
사회언어학
2021 .12
-
한⸱중 담화표지의 통사⸱화용 특징 대조
중국어문학논집
2020 .12
-
국어 담화표지화에 관한 연구
한말연구
2021 .12
-
‘수필’ 개념을 둘러싼 학술 담론과 교육 담론의 긴장
문학교육학
2019 .01
-
표준 국어 문법 담화론 분야의 특징과 활용
언어와 정보사회
2018 .01
-
`비판적 담화 분석`의 문법교육적 적용 가능성 : 문법 담화 교육을 중심으로
국어교육연구
2016 .06
-
민족문학, 제3세계, 동아시아 - 최원식의 동아시아론의 계보와 구조
동방학지
2020 .01
-
맨스필드의 희열 에 그려진 여성의 불안과 소외, 그리고 자유간접화법의 효과
영미문학페미니즘
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-912-003134332