지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제109호
- 발행연도
- 2018.9
- 수록면
- 453 - 491 (39page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2018.09.109.453
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korean historians tend to agree upon the causes that triggered the breakout of the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> Movement. It was perceived by many, that the Japanese colonial authorities’ blatant oppression as well as economic exploitation essentially gave birth to the National Liberation Front of Koreans. And then, the U.S. President Wilson’s declaration of the Principle of National Self-determination in 1918 was coincidentally followed by Joseon King Gojong’s death. The public’s anger and frustration that had been building for years finally exploded, and the religious leaders were apparently able to channel them into a grand social movement.
At first, these explanations concerning the causes of the very movement do not provide us with a clear answer to the questions, such as how a countrywide social upheaval involving the entire spectrum of Korean population was even made possible in the first place, and what was the most prominent factor that ultimately provoked the movement. Secondly, It also prevented us from further engaging in the research of several institutional as well as cultural elements that would have contributed to the aggravation of social problems in the 1910s.
In the past, Korean historians used to suggest either Wilson’s Declaration or the Russian October Revolution as external causes of the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement. And in their analysis of the domestic background of the movement, they also raised several notions of either the national elites leading the charge or the general public being the main thrust behind it. Sometimes they even employed a theory that all those shout-outs that occurred in different areas were staged for different reasons and with different backgrounds.
In this article, colonial oppressors’ discriminative policy, excessive and hasty implementation of modern institutions, unbearable exploitation & mobilization ofresources in Korea, and society-wide anger that had accumulated for yearstoward brute forces of the Japanese Military police, are mentioned as systemicelements that caused the movement to initially form. Meanwhile, it also seems like some additional elements were in play, as landlords and religious leaders of Joseon could have been inspired by or simply inclined to utilize international elements and mobilize the Korean population, which needed a channel to vent their anger that would ultimately spark a globally unprecedented National movement.
This kind of perspective employed in searching for the causes of the March 1st movement would hopefully prompt us to understand the dual nature of colonial modernity of Joseon society, which had both a ‘colonized’ aspect and a ‘modernized’ aspect.
At first, these explanations concerning the causes of the very movement do not provide us with a clear answer to the questions, such as how a countrywide social upheaval involving the entire spectrum of Korean population was even made possible in the first place, and what was the most prominent factor that ultimately provoked the movement. Secondly, It also prevented us from further engaging in the research of several institutional as well as cultural elements that would have contributed to the aggravation of social problems in the 1910s.
In the past, Korean historians used to suggest either Wilson’s Declaration or the Russian October Revolution as external causes of the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement. And in their analysis of the domestic background of the movement, they also raised several notions of either the national elites leading the charge or the general public being the main thrust behind it. Sometimes they even employed a theory that all those shout-outs that occurred in different areas were staged for different reasons and with different backgrounds.
In this article, colonial oppressors’ discriminative policy, excessive and hasty implementation of modern institutions, unbearable exploitation & mobilization ofresources in Korea, and society-wide anger that had accumulated for yearstoward brute forces of the Japanese Military police, are mentioned as systemicelements that caused the movement to initially form. Meanwhile, it also seems like some additional elements were in play, as landlords and religious leaders of Joseon could have been inspired by or simply inclined to utilize international elements and mobilize the Korean population, which needed a channel to vent their anger that would ultimately spark a globally unprecedented National movement.
This kind of perspective employed in searching for the causes of the March 1st movement would hopefully prompt us to understand the dual nature of colonial modernity of Joseon society, which had both a ‘colonized’ aspect and a ‘modernized’ aspect.
목차
머리말
1. 민족 자결주의론과 러시아 10월 혁명론
2. 민족 엘리트 선도론과 민중 봉기론
3. 지역사의 등장과 다양한 원인론
4. 민족 · 민중 · 지역을 넘어서
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (55)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
민족과 혁명: 1920년대 초 사회주의 수용에서 러시아혁명 인식의 문제
민족문학사연구
2021 .12
-
세계사 속의 러시아혁명
한중관계연구
2018 .01
-
[러시아] 회고와 전망: 2015~2016년 러시아사 : ‘더 많이 다양하게 쓰기’의 재현
역사학보
2017 .09
-
민족자결주의인가, 아니면 대동아공영권인가?
역사비평
2019 .05
-
레닌의 혁명 사상과 민족자결주의: 제1차 세계대전 시기를 중심으로
역사학연구
2020 .01
-
현대 러시아 민족주의
현대사상
2021 .07
-
1960~1970년대 초 지식인들의 사유구조와 역사 서사-『창작과비평』을 중심으로
인문논총
2023 .05
-
잡지 『신생활』의 문화 정치와 러시아혁명사
민족문화연구
2023 .02
-
현대사의 기점으로서의 러시아 혁명
역사와현실
2020 .03
-
문학사 기술과 이념성 : 한국적 맥락에서 읽는 신간 옥스퍼드 러시아문학사
슬라브학보
2019 .03
-
러시아 역사 속 러시아정교 이해하기 - 기독교 선교를 위한 접근과 함의
복음과 선교
2020 .01
-
공익광고를 통해서 본 현대 러시아 사회- 2000년대 이후 주요 이슈와 변화 양상 -
외국학연구
2022 .06
-
민족주의에 대한 비판적 성찰을 통한 한국 기독교와 민족주의 접합에 관한 소고
장신논단
2017 .03
-
1910년대의 ‘혁명’ ㅡ 3·1운동 전야의 개념과 용법을 중심으로 ㅡ
개념과 소통
2015 .01
-
동학소설에 나타난 혁명 주체로서의 민중
현대문학이론연구
2019 .01
-
이정희, 『은둔의 나라 러시아 역사 속 민중』 상, 하 (영남대학교 출판부 2018, 2020).
서양사론
2020 .01
-
국권회복(1945년) 이후 ‘3.1혁명’에 대한 평가·인식 및 그 의미
仙道文化
2020 .01
-
리영희와 냉전기 중국혁명운동사의 탄생
역사와실학
2018 .04
-
어떤 민족주의를 할 것인가
현대사상
2021 .07
-
20세기 초 중국의 근대국가 구상과 러시아 1차 혁명
인문논총
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0