메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제61권 제3호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
267 - 290 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper examines the positioning and boundness of if-clauses in relation to main clauses. Based on Chafe (1984), if-clauses are divided into four types: Type A (preposed bound), Type B (postposed bound), Type C (preposed free), Type D (postposed free). A total of 200 if-clauses were analysed using academic writings and spoken data in COCA in order to represent written English and spoken English. The results showed that Type C is the most typical use of if-clauses and that Type B is used relatively frequently. Type A and Type D were hardly used, and particularly, Type D was not found in written English. Thus, preposed if-clauses tend to be free from the main clause with the comma or the pause, while postposed if-clauses tend to be bound to main clauses without the comma or the pause. Spoken English showed a stronger tendency for typical preposed and free if-clauses, and postposed bound if-clauses were used more frequently in written English. In line with Chafe (1984), preposed free if-clauses are shown to function as guideposts signaling an orientation for the information in the main clause. Postposed bound if-clauses tend to convey new information while main clauses express given information. However, some postposed bound if-clauses were found to add something as afterthoughts to the assertion made in the main clause. (2005).

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0