메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
함보영 (고려대학교) 송철호 (고려대학교) 박은빈 (고려대학교) 최솔이 (고려대학교) 이우균 (고려대학교)
저널정보
한국기후변화학회 한국기후변화학회지 Journal of Climate Change Research Vol.11 No.1
발행연도
2020.2
수록면
53 - 63 (11page)
DOI
10.15531/ksccr.2020.11.1.53

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
After the Paris Agreement, the Republic of Korea also has own Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), and forest sector has to sequestrate 22 million tons of CO₂ eq. by 2030 and to develop a national inventory and Land‐Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry (LULUCF) system. However, forest activity data have been neglected in the assessment process, because they have been partially recorded from various data sources. Therefore, this study collects available data to represent forest activity data and integrates them considering spatial availability based on Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines and approaches from the Kyoto Protocol. National and private spatial data were collected, and the available data as forest activity data were selected. Subsequently, forest management records on address‐based locations were converted to spatial data by spatial joining and overlying. As a result, around 1.25 million forest management and afforestation recodes are available. Based on these records, the estimated average forest management rate considering regional distribution is 31.2% during 2013‐2017, and the estimated forest management rate reflecting average values for missing management recodes is 43.1% during 2003‐2017. This study suggests a spatial approach to develop proper calculation of forest management rate despite differences in forest management rate caused by missing data from filed activities and limitation of spatial data during overlaying analysis. Therefore, more forest data are needed to secure the future development of a national forest inventory.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. 서론
2. 연구 재료 및 방법
3. 결과
4. 고찰
5. 결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-453-000454263