메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생성문법학회 생성문법연구 생성문법연구 제30권 제1호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
91 - 113 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to examine the free Merge-based labeling analysis by Epstein, Kitahara and Seely (EKS, 2014, 2015) and Rizzi's (2015, 2016, 2017) Criterial Freezing (CF) and Maximality-based analysis to figure out which approach is more viable in handling the CF phenomenon. We argue that unlike the claim by EKS, both approaches are not in direct conflict with each other, and that although EKS’s free Merge-based analysis strengthens the theoretical ground of Chomsky’s (2013, 2015) strong minimalism, Rizzi's approach is superior to EKS’s in that it is a consequence of Chomsky’s minimal search constraining free Merge and can successfully account for subextraction. Rizzi (2015) proposes Maximality to capture what he calls ’obligatory halting,’ but acknowledging that extraction is not completely impossible from criterial positions, Rizzi (2017) weakens CF to accommodate subextraction cases in English and Italian. We further demonstrate that although there are cases that appear to run counter to CF effects due to apparent stepwise movements out of a criterial position, his revised CF combined with Maximality can handle those data. In particular, we provide cross-linguistic data from Korean, Japanese, and Indonesian to show how a single wh-phrase with multiple criterial features ends up satisfying the CF principle in the relevant criterial position.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (36)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0