메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국도시행정학회 도시행정학보 도시행정학보 제20집 제3호
발행연도
2007.12
수록면
157 - 177 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The government has proposed a plan to adopt a new approach to public land development which would reduce land price instability in surrounding areas of public land development arising from cash-oriented land compensation systems. Up to date, two types of land development have been used. One is the compulsory purchase by the eminent domain and the other is the land substitution by land readjustment project.
The land substitution method contributes to the protection of land owner's right and reduces additional land flows in surrounding areas while it requires longer development time and does not ensure qualified development. On the other hand, public land development by compulsory purchase helps provide promptly enough land but increase in land price in the surrounding areas. In order to reduce these social costs arising from land development, it is urgent to figure out mixed land development methods for improving land development skills.
This research was able to suggest that public land development by the land provision compensation rather than the cash or bond compensation can increase the living compensation for the current residents, enjoy development benefits by income level, and minimize land liquidity by the large-scaled development.
From the empirical study, we found out that the suggested approach can reduce 34% land compensation costs and the effect could be larger when the land provision compensation system is in effect. However, some conflicts between land owners and developers or agencies are expected. In the further research it is necessary to carry out how to mitigate those aspects for the new land development approach.

목차

ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 기존 토지개발방식에 대한 고찰
Ⅲ. 새로운 개발방식의 모색 필요성
Ⅳ. 대토보상제도 도입방안
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (5)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-359-001423633