지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Can corporations be criminals? Although corporations can be persons in certain legal context, they cannot so easily be criminals in Korean legal culture, because most legal academics are unwilling to see corporate criminal liability as legally acceptable. The major reason why the legal circles are inclined to deny such a liability is, firstly the corporations have no souls like a man which make man be able to apprehend the meaning of moral blameworthiness and punishment as a response of that blame, and secondly, they don’t have, if any, own intention which is different from their agent, but comes from the corporation itself.
However, the it is possible to morally blame corporation's activity and to impute some crimes of corporation, whether the crimes are committed through its agent or for itself, to corporation's own intent. Two kinds of theory or model can explain the mechanism. One is the romantic model of collective guilt theory. According to this model, in some condition on which the internal cohesion between an actor and the collective entity surrounding him is very strong, not only an actor but also the collective entity like corporation can be culpable and an actor's guilt should be mitigated, because the collective entity's immoral culture and practive encouraged him to commit such crimes through its organic collectivity. From this mechanism, a corporation can be a subject to be morally blamed.
And the other model is organization theory. This theory stresses the need to view corporate actions as a product of the organizational structure, rather than as a matter of individual choice. In the view of this model, a corporation is regarded as intentional systems possessed of organizational intelligence. In short, a corporation is similar to intelligent machine that has its own intention. From these two models we can conclude that it is possible to see a corporation as a legal subject to be culpable and to have its own intention.
However, the it is possible to morally blame corporation's activity and to impute some crimes of corporation, whether the crimes are committed through its agent or for itself, to corporation's own intent. Two kinds of theory or model can explain the mechanism. One is the romantic model of collective guilt theory. According to this model, in some condition on which the internal cohesion between an actor and the collective entity surrounding him is very strong, not only an actor but also the collective entity like corporation can be culpable and an actor's guilt should be mitigated, because the collective entity's immoral culture and practive encouraged him to commit such crimes through its organic collectivity. From this mechanism, a corporation can be a subject to be morally blamed.
And the other model is organization theory. This theory stresses the need to view corporate actions as a product of the organizational structure, rather than as a matter of individual choice. In the view of this model, a corporation is regarded as intentional systems possessed of organizational intelligence. In short, a corporation is similar to intelligent machine that has its own intention. From these two models we can conclude that it is possible to see a corporation as a legal subject to be culpable and to have its own intention.
목차
Ⅰ. 법인의 범죄능력, 무엇이 문제인가?
Ⅱ. 낭만주의모델
Ⅲ. 조직모델
Ⅳ. 낭만주의모델과 조직모델에 대한 평가
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
기업범죄에 대한 형사적 제재에 관한 연구
법학연구
2004 .12
-
당대 중국 회사범죄 논쟁문제의 연구
비교형사법연구
2013 .01
-
미국에서의 법인에 대한 형사책임귀속 모델과 그 시사점
중앙법학
2015 .06
-
기업범죄에 관한 연구
법학연구
2003 .06
-
미국법상 S 주식회사제도에 관한 소고
기업법연구
2012 .06
-
범죄피해자로서 법인의 본질 -모욕죄와 협박죄를 중심으로-
피해자학연구
2008 .01
-
THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE PUBLIC CORPORATION
저스티스
1974 .12
-
페이퍼컴퍼니와 법인제도의 남용
경영법률
2011 .01
-
법익적대적 법인문화, 위험관리 실패와 법인의 형사책임
형사정책연구
2011 .12
-
기업의 경제활동에 관한 형사법제 연구(Ⅰ)
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2009 .12
-
기업의 사회적 성과평가 제도 : 외국 사례를 중심으로
한국사회과학연구
2003 .12
-
회사의 본질에 관한 담론
법과기업연구
2014 .06
-
회사의 동일성, 채무면탈 목적과 법인격부인론의 적용 －대법원 2010.1.14. 선고 2009다77327 판결－
경영법률
2011 .01
-
다국적기업 범죄 및 효과적인 저지를 논함
비교형사법연구
2013 .01
-
회사규모와 지배구조의 개편 : 2009년 개정상법을 중심으로
기업법연구
2010 .09
-
법인의 범죄능력인정을 위한 새로운 해석의 필요성 : 기업의 생명침해에 대한 대응을 중심으로
형사정책연구
2007 .09
-
미국의 기업간 거래의 공정성에 대한 고찰 - ALI의 회사지배의 원리를 중심으로 -
비교법학연구
2004 .09
-
주ㆍ토공 통합의 효율성 평가 : 자료포락분석을 통한 지방공기업과의 재무제표상 비교를 중심으로
도시행정학보
2009 .08
-
기업의 불법행위에 대한 제재의 다양화 방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2016 .12
-
환경범죄에서 형사책임의 주체
법학연구
2011 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000498151