메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박문서 (호원대학교)
저널정보
한국통상정보학회 통상정보연구 통상정보연구 제11권 제2호
발행연도
2009.6
수록면
173 - 201 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As a result of overemphasizing the goods sector in trade structure, Korea does not meet properly the global trend which has the key role of ‘trade in services’ as the service economy have been expanded. Hereafter, it is easily forecasted that trade in services will be one of the main factors for Korea’s competitiveness and engine of growth.
Nevertheless, because Korea does not equip the concreteness of governance for trade in services, it is possible that the efficiency deterioration of trade volume, confusion of Korea’s trade policy, conflict among trading countries, and discordance between the interested parties may be occurred.
This paper analyzes the governance system of Korea for trade in services in order to enhance the competitiveness reflecting the importance of trade in services and to draw some strategies for remodeling the service governance system. It is expected to raise the efficiency of Korea’s trade policy by constructing the systematic governance for trade in services, and to remove lots of latent risks during global transactions by improving the imbalance between manufacturing and service part for the development of trade in services in Korea.
Analysis revealed itself the result that Korea is weak enough to can not identify the governance system about trade in services. Except ‘Extent of Services’ article of the Foreign Trade Act, Korea has not prepared the governance system for trade in services so that governance system have been scattered overly or decentralized.
Problems about trade in services are not limited to enterprise’s side, but extended to all the players including government agency whole, academic world and research institute. Therefore, the governance of trade in services should be strengthened and systematized by making the model law for trade in services(provisional name : Master Law for Trade in Services or Promotion Law for Trade in Services) by formatting type of fundamental law or separate legislation. If the bill legislation does not meet the conditions, the Foreign Trade Act should be totally reformed to Omnibus Trade Act concept including trade in services.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 서비스무역 거버넌스의 배경연구
Ⅲ. 서비스무역 거버넌스의 현황 및 문제점
Ⅳ. 서비스무역 거버넌스의 리모델링 방안
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-326-000771268