지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 291 (291page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Although bicycle promotion policy has been carried out by central and local governments for 15 years since the Bicycle Promotion Act was legislated in 1995, the condition for it is still negative. Seoul metropolitan government is preparing various policies for bicycle users including providing bicycle roads by reducing the car lanes, and enforcing city plan projects to provide bicycle road or parking lot for bicycles. However, we should review seriously if such expansion of bicycle facilities contribute much to the promotion of bicycle use. We need to investigate the reason why the traffic share of bicycles has been rather reduced from that of 15 years ago.
Although the result of field survey shows discrepancy between the districts, it is confirmed that the environment for bicycle use in Seoul is very poor in general. Especially, the condition is even worse in alleys compared to that in the main or sub-arterial road, and facilities for bicycle in the living zone fall short. In order to reduce traffic share of cars and increase that of bicycles, use of bicycle in everyday life should be encouraged. In the cities, there are facilities used frequently in everyday life such as schools, neighborhood facilities, offices, and everyday business facilities in the vicinity of dwelling zones. However, there lacks facilities for bicycles in such zone. In order to foster use of bicycle more practically, it is considered necessary to provide with sufficient facilities in the living zones, other than riverside roads which are used for leisure activities or arterial roads which are used for commuting purpose.
Result of survey shows that citizens of Seoul use bicycle mainly to enjoy leisure or to move, and the reason of avoiding use of bicycles is inconvenience or danger in using them. However, they have very positive opinion in promoting bicycle use. Most citizens prefer expansion of bicycle roads by reducing car lanes. More than half of those who don"t use bicycle expressed intention to join in using bicycles once the condition is improved, for which appropriate policies are called for.
Bicycles are a kind of device to move. They are personal of family properties. So, they need storage and facilities for safe ride. Presently, storage facilities are not proper, and alleys in the village are very dangerous. Total environment of the roads to living facilities such as those to schools, to private institutes, to markets and marts, to work should be examined. Although it would be difficult to refurbish all the roads in Seoul city for use of bicycles, it is required to furnish alleys to facilitate safe and convenient move of citizens, and to install storages for bicycle. Living spaces for bicycles are closely related to everyday live of citizens, connecting their house, living facilities, schools, markets, and work place each other. If bicycle is considered just as a tool of leisure or exercise, increase of bicycle users would become sluggish soon. Bicycle use will be activated in our life only when it performs the role as one of daily necessaries for people to move short distance in their everyday life. We should share living or cultural space with bicycles, in order to appropriate bicycles a role as a living necessity. Once bicycle use is fostered we could form closer social relations and improve encounter, touch, and exchange with each other, freeing ourselves from closed dwelling structure and car space.
Although the result of field survey shows discrepancy between the districts, it is confirmed that the environment for bicycle use in Seoul is very poor in general. Especially, the condition is even worse in alleys compared to that in the main or sub-arterial road, and facilities for bicycle in the living zone fall short. In order to reduce traffic share of cars and increase that of bicycles, use of bicycle in everyday life should be encouraged. In the cities, there are facilities used frequently in everyday life such as schools, neighborhood facilities, offices, and everyday business facilities in the vicinity of dwelling zones. However, there lacks facilities for bicycles in such zone. In order to foster use of bicycle more practically, it is considered necessary to provide with sufficient facilities in the living zones, other than riverside roads which are used for leisure activities or arterial roads which are used for commuting purpose.
Result of survey shows that citizens of Seoul use bicycle mainly to enjoy leisure or to move, and the reason of avoiding use of bicycles is inconvenience or danger in using them. However, they have very positive opinion in promoting bicycle use. Most citizens prefer expansion of bicycle roads by reducing car lanes. More than half of those who don"t use bicycle expressed intention to join in using bicycles once the condition is improved, for which appropriate policies are called for.
Bicycles are a kind of device to move. They are personal of family properties. So, they need storage and facilities for safe ride. Presently, storage facilities are not proper, and alleys in the village are very dangerous. Total environment of the roads to living facilities such as those to schools, to private institutes, to markets and marts, to work should be examined. Although it would be difficult to refurbish all the roads in Seoul city for use of bicycles, it is required to furnish alleys to facilitate safe and convenient move of citizens, and to install storages for bicycle. Living spaces for bicycles are closely related to everyday live of citizens, connecting their house, living facilities, schools, markets, and work place each other. If bicycle is considered just as a tool of leisure or exercise, increase of bicycle users would become sluggish soon. Bicycle use will be activated in our life only when it performs the role as one of daily necessaries for people to move short distance in their everyday life. We should share living or cultural space with bicycles, in order to appropriate bicycles a role as a living necessity. Once bicycle use is fostered we could form closer social relations and improve encounter, touch, and exchange with each other, freeing ourselves from closed dwelling structure and car space.
목차
[표지]
[총론]
[요약 및 정책건의]
[목차]
표목차
그림목차
[제1장 연구의 개요]
제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적
제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법
제3절 관련 법규 및 계획 검토
[제2장 서울은 자전거 타기에 좋은 도시인가?]
제1절 오늘의 자전거 공간
제2절 연구대상지의 자전거 생활문화
제3절 시민들이 느끼는 자전거 문화 현실과 바람
제4절 종합정리 및 시사점
[제3장 어떻게 하면 시민들이 자전거를 타게 할 것인가?]
제1절 안전한 자전거
제2절 편리한 자전거
제3절 시민의 일상생활공간에서 자전거 문화 공간 만들기
[제4장 결론 및 정책제언]
제1절 결론
제2절 정책제언
[참고문헌]
[부록]
1. 설문조사지
2. 설문조사 세부분석
3. 송파구 자전거 보관시설 및 서초구 서래마을 과속방지턱 현장조사 자료
[영문요약(Abstract)]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
자전거 이용 활성화 방안
경기논단
2001 .07
-
자전거관광활성화 중요속성에 따른 만족도 및 행동의도 연구
관광레저연구
2015 .01
-
자전거의 안전성 확보를 위한 정책방향 연구
도시행정학보
2001 .12
-
개인형 이동수단 이용 증가에 따른 자전거도로 개선방안
정책연구
2018 .07
-
공공자전거 운영을 통한 도시 재생 : 창원시 공공자전거 시스템을 중심으로
서비스경영학회지
2014 .11
-
자전거 수단분담률에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석 : 토빗회귀분석을 이용하여
한국지역개발학회지
2010 .09
-
중소도시 자전거교통의 활성화 방안 : 안동시를 중심으로
도시행정학보
2002 .08
-
Nu Bicycle
한국관광레저학회 학술발표대회
2017 .12
-
자전거도로 투자 우선순위 평가방안 : 오산시 사례를 중심으로
GRI 연구논총
2011 .04
-
자전거에 대한 규제내용분석과 개정방향
규제연구
1999 .12
-
자전거길 이용객의 지각된 가치, 만족, 재방문의도에 관한 연구 : 한강(서울)/남한강 자전거길 이용객을 중심으로
관광레저연구
2014 .11
-
생활교통형 자전거도로의 주변 토지이용 특성을 반영한 유형별 서비스 질 평가
서울도시연구
2013 .09
-
AMOEBA 기법을 응용한 서울시 자전거 네트워크의 클러스터 분석
한국도시지리학회지
2012 .01
-
자전거를 통한 서울의 관광자원 발굴
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2010 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-359-001025811