메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
윤여일 (서울대학교)
저널정보
고려대학교 아세아문제연구원 아세아연구 아세아연구 통권 158호
발행연도
2014.12
수록면
72 - 109 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The transition process of East Asian discourse from the early 1990s to the mid-2000s is analyzed in this study. By investigating feature articles of academic journals and papers regarding East Asia, it examined statuses and orientations in the use of the notion of East Asia, and inspected the process of transition and differentiation according to phases. To summarize, the role of ‘Changbi’(Creation and Criticism) in the early 1990s was important in the appearance of discussion that could be named as East Asian discourse. Immediately afterwards, humanities scholars, especially scholars of Korea, China and Japan specialized in literature, history and philosophy fired discussion on East Asian identity. In the mid-1990s, social scientists from sociology, economics and political science joined the discussion making attempts to explain the distinctiveness of economic development in East Asia, and after the economic crisis of the late 1990s, discussion on the necessity of East Asian regional institution rose among diplomatic scientists and economists. From the beginning of 2000s, researchers of international politics and international relations regularized the discourse of East Asian community in the period of People’s Government(Kim Dae-Jung Government), and by the mid-2000s of Participatory Government(Roh Moo-Hyun Government), the regional name of ‘Northeast Asia’ emerged as a strategic measure of Korea, establishing East Asian discourse as a policy discourse. As above, discourses with different orientations appeared and emerged in different periods, competing with existing discourse and unfolding the politics of discourses.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 동아시아 시각의 출현: 1990년대 초반
Ⅲ. 동아시아 담론의 형성: 1990년대 중반
Ⅳ. 동아시아 담론의 정치: 1990년대 후반
Ⅴ. 동아시아 담론의 지역(주의)화: 2000년대 초반
Ⅵ. 동아시아 담론의 쇠퇴기: 2000년대 중반
Ⅶ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (4)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-300-001050182