메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김유리 (신라대학교) 문용은 (신라대학교)
저널정보
한국인터넷전자상거래학회 인터넷전자상거래연구 인터넷전자상거래연구 제18권 제6호
발행연도
2018.12
수록면
1 - 19 (19page)
DOI
10.37272/JIECR.2018.12.18.6.1

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The aim of the research is to investigate the resistance factors about consumer acceptance of Unmanned Order Payment System on Omni Channel based on Ram"s "Innovation Resistance Model". The research was conducted based on a survey of 311 consumers aged between 10 and 60, and the Frequency Analysis, Descriptive Statistics Reliability Verification, Factor Analysis, and Multiple Regression Analysis are carried out using SPSS 20.0. The results of this research are as follows. First, the perceived resistance factors of consumers appeared in order of "perceived risk" > "complexity" > "reversibility" > "consumer innovation"> "relative advantage". Second, Multiple Regression Analysis was performed by setting five consumer resistance factors (relative advantage, complexity, reversibility, consumer innovation, and perceived risk) as independent variables and setting innovation resistance as dependent variable. As a result, it was found that the higher complexity and reversibility and perceived risk, the more innovation resistance increased. And the higher relative advantage and consumer innovation, the more innovation resistance decreased. Third, among the consumer resistance factors, the highest influence factor on innovation resistance was "Complexity", followed by "relative advantage", "consumer innovation", "returnability" and "perceived risk". This is analyzed as complexity of order and payment process in actual usage is the biggest factor make consumers recognize the most concerned part as "perceived risk" when using the Omni Channel"s Unmanned Order Payment System to resist the new system.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 연구결과
Ⅴ. 결론 및 시사점
참고문헌

참고문헌 (53)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-323-000296887