지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In case that we discuss the notion and category of modern novels, we should think of its period, contents, writers' consciousness and narrative techniques all together. However generally until now we have attached importance on the preceding two factors. In the discussion of the novels modernity, the narrative techniques and strategies have not been is hardly created enough.
In the discussion of our modern novels, Kim Dong-In is more important than anybody else for the following reason. To begin with, in the dawning of the modern literature he started literary activities as he put the modernity of literature in question. In the next place he studied literature in Japan that influenced on the formation of our modern literature. In succession few Koreans had a good knowledge of literature theories as he was at a literary history of ours. Up to now the study of Kim Dong-In have attached importance on the preceding two elements. And the study of his literature theories are not treated well.
There are several points of Kim Dong-In's theories on novels that we should watch out for. They are consciousness of modern novel's genre, the theories on the novels' constituent factors and the theories on the novels' narrative techniques. That's what I want to say. In consciousness of genre and theories on the navel's constituent factors he can stand comparison with contemporary theories. Only it feels nor quite satisfied on the theories of the novels' narrative techniques. Because the studies of this field have been progressing steadily. Nevertheless, it is worth noticing that he divides it into observer[viewer] and narrator.
Kim Dong-In had an important bearing on the formation and development of our modern novels through the creative writing novels. And he set up the framework of our modern novels through the theories on the novels. In conclusion, Kim Dong-In contributed to the completion of our modern novels because he took the issue with modern narrative techniques & strategies and practice it.
In the discussion of our modern novels, Kim Dong-In is more important than anybody else for the following reason. To begin with, in the dawning of the modern literature he started literary activities as he put the modernity of literature in question. In the next place he studied literature in Japan that influenced on the formation of our modern literature. In succession few Koreans had a good knowledge of literature theories as he was at a literary history of ours. Up to now the study of Kim Dong-In have attached importance on the preceding two elements. And the study of his literature theories are not treated well.
There are several points of Kim Dong-In's theories on novels that we should watch out for. They are consciousness of modern novel's genre, the theories on the novels' constituent factors and the theories on the novels' narrative techniques. That's what I want to say. In consciousness of genre and theories on the navel's constituent factors he can stand comparison with contemporary theories. Only it feels nor quite satisfied on the theories of the novels' narrative techniques. Because the studies of this field have been progressing steadily. Nevertheless, it is worth noticing that he divides it into observer[viewer] and narrator.
Kim Dong-In had an important bearing on the formation and development of our modern novels through the creative writing novels. And he set up the framework of our modern novels through the theories on the novels. In conclusion, Kim Dong-In contributed to the completion of our modern novels because he took the issue with modern narrative techniques & strategies and practice it.
목차
1. 서론
2. 김동인 소설론의 실체
3. 김동인 소설론의 현대소설적 의의
4. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
近代 Ⅱ (1910~1945)
역사학보
2001 .09
-
最近世(開港~)
역사학보
1996 .12
-
最近世(開港~)
역사학보
1993 .12
-
近代Ⅱ(1910~1945)
역사학보
2004 .09
-
近代 Ⅱ (1910~)
역사학보
2000 .09
-
最近世
역사학보
1984 .12
-
近代 Ⅰ (1876~)
역사학보
1999 .09
-
近代 Ⅱ(1910~1945)
역사학보
2002 .09
-
近代Ⅰ(1876~1910)
역사학보
2004 .09
-
最近世
역사학보
1987 .12
-
最近世
역사학보
1990 .12
-
近代 Ⅱ (1910~)
역사학보
1999 .09
-
近代 Ⅰ (1876~1910)
역사학보
2001 .09
-
近代 Ⅰ(1876~)
역사학보
2000 .09
-
Modern Korea and Literature
Korea Journal
1962 .08
-
Modern Korea Literature
Korea Journal
1967 .12
-
김동인 초기 소설 연구
현대소설연구
2000 .12
-
Modern Korean Novels
Korea Journal
1970 .06
-
A Comparative Analysis of Four English Translations of “Gamja” by Kim Dong-in
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2007 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
김동인 문학의 리얼리티 재고 : 비평과 1930년대 초반까지의 단편 소설을 중심으로
유승환
한국현대문학연구
2007
.08
1910년대 1인칭 소설의 소설사적 의미
이동길
국어국문학
1994
.12
정서적 공간체험의 현상으로서 공간적 분위기의 의미와 공간 디자인 구현 방법 : O.F. Bollnow의 공간론과 Peter Zumthor의 공간디자인을 중심으로
김윤정
,
박찬일
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2015
.04
문학 문화콘텐츠의 원형, 낭독
주현진
국제언어문학
2016
.08
허련순의 <중국색시>에 나타난 디아스포라의 치유 양상
김미란
현대소설연구
2015
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0