지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Seen from a perspective that views history as a series of movements, the theory of Internal development seems to have first appeared with the resurgence of Nationalism which happened with the breakout of the April 19th democratic movement, then diverged into several directions, and later merged with the flow of "People's Nationalism" and played an instrumental part in the launching of the so-called "People's History," which opted for a historical perspective concentrating upon changes and reforms in human history. In other words, the theory of Internal Development was a product of the Korean historical community, and shared the same destiny with the evolution of Nationalism, that had always served certain causes such as 'pursuing the Centrist path' or 'pursuing Cooperation (between the Left and the Right)' within the South Korean society.
And to be noticed, historical studies based upon materialistic conception of history, which were positioned in the rather 'Left field' within the spectrum of Internal Development theories, coexisted with several other trends of studies under the umbrella of the theory of Internal Development, and just like Nationalism which worked as a defensive shield against the infiltration of Communism, served as a bridge between several steps of historical studies, such as the Marxist historical studies that surged right after the liberation from the Japanese occupation, the Practical history movement suggested by the Neo-Nationalist historical studies, and the history movements that resurfaced with the establishment of People's history in the 1980s. Although it did not survive and evolve into a lasting historical movement armed with momentum and practicality, due to the issues of the time such as division of the Korean peninsula, the prevailing anti-Communist sentiment and the conservative nature of the historical community, it did play an important role of bridging trends together.
The reason why the historical community since the 1980s was able to provide the democratization movement with a firm historical statement of changes and reforms, and also bring popularity to the history movements, was because historical studies based upon the Internal Development theory and especially the materialistic conception of history continued to accumulate in terms of quality and quantity in the 1960s and '70s. This was a trend that was never to be found in other areas and branches of academic studies.
And to be noticed, historical studies based upon materialistic conception of history, which were positioned in the rather 'Left field' within the spectrum of Internal Development theories, coexisted with several other trends of studies under the umbrella of the theory of Internal Development, and just like Nationalism which worked as a defensive shield against the infiltration of Communism, served as a bridge between several steps of historical studies, such as the Marxist historical studies that surged right after the liberation from the Japanese occupation, the Practical history movement suggested by the Neo-Nationalist historical studies, and the history movements that resurfaced with the establishment of People's history in the 1980s. Although it did not survive and evolve into a lasting historical movement armed with momentum and practicality, due to the issues of the time such as division of the Korean peninsula, the prevailing anti-Communist sentiment and the conservative nature of the historical community, it did play an important role of bridging trends together.
The reason why the historical community since the 1980s was able to provide the democratization movement with a firm historical statement of changes and reforms, and also bring popularity to the history movements, was because historical studies based upon the Internal Development theory and especially the materialistic conception of history continued to accumulate in terms of quality and quantity in the 1960s and '70s. This was a trend that was never to be found in other areas and branches of academic studies.
목차
머리말
1. 저항적 민족주의와 역사 운동의 전통
2. 민족주의의 부활과 내재적 발전론의 등장
3. 내재적 발전론의 전개와 분화
4. 내재적 발전론과 민중적 민족주의의 조우
5. 변혁 사론으로서의 민중사학과 역사 운동
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (56)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
현재의 한국사 연구와 역사관 문제
韓國史學史學報
2003 .01
-
Historical Characteristics of Korean Nationalism
Korea Journal
1966 .12
-
전근대 국사의 형성과 그 발전
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
-
歷史理論
역사학보
1989 .12
-
[사상사ㆍ역사이론] 낡은 새로운 역사와 새로운 낡은 역사 : 역사이론ㆍ사학사의 침체와 사상사의 부상
역사학보
2013 .09
-
韓國 近現代史 敎育에서 民族主義와 近代主體
역사교육
2005 .09
-
20세기 한국사학의 시기별 연구사적 특성 : 1934년~1990년대를 중심으로
역사학보
2007 .12
-
역사 서술의 문학성과 역사소설의 새로운 경향
국어국문학
2005 .12
-
역사교육과 역사학의 거리
역사교육
2016 .06
-
포스트모던 역사인식과 역사학습
역사교육
2000 .06
-
Korean Studies between the Social Sciences and Historical Studies : Debates over Modern and Contemporary Korean History
Korea Journal
2011 .09
-
‘내재적 발전론’ 역사인식의 궤적과 전망
한국사연구
2011 .03
-
歷史敎材의 撰述에서 用語選定의 問題
역사교육
2009 .03
-
지구사의 미래와 역사의 재개념화
역사학보
2008 .12
-
역사적 사실의 특징과 역사교육의 특수성
역사교육
2010 .03
-
고등학교 세계사 교과서의 중국고중세사 서술 : 역사 용어를 중심으로
역사교육
2017 .06
-
역사 수업 이론의 진전과 적용상의 도전
역사교육
2014 .09
-
한국사와 역사철학
유라시아문화
2020 .08
-
세계사 교과서 현대사 단원의 학생 활동 분석
역사교육
2020 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-003636672