지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The problem comes up whether the caddie is worker or not at workplace. In this regard, The Supreme court judged that the caddie is not worker from the standpoint of LABOR STANDARD ACT, but that the caddie is worker from the standpoint of TRADE UNION AND LABOR RELATIONS ADJUSTMENT ACT.
The Supreme do not account for this judgement in greater detail, The Caddie can not understand it. So we need the detail explanation. The Constitution Act is the superior law in the legal system. Therefore it controls the labor law. If the labor law breaches the constitution law, the article of labor law is void.
There are the employees’ rights to enhance working conditions on the 33 article of Constitution Act. That are the right to independent association, collective bargaining, and collective action. By the way, we can not find the explanation to concept of worker on the Constitution Act. So the explanation to the concept of worker should be given.
To get the concept of worker on the Constitution Act we need to acknowledge how the right to independent association was adopted into the Constitution Act. In other words that is to know the historical nature of constitution.
The system of industrial capitalism as the result of Industrial Revolution beginning in England happened a lot of problems. To resolve them Socialism arose. The supporter of capitalism adopt the social rights into constitution law against the socialism. One of them is the right to independent association. That is the concept of worker includes the antagonistic relationship between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. In brief the concept of worker represents the proletariat.
To the conclusion, The Supreme court must judge the worker of TRADE UNION AND LABOR RELATIONS ADJUSTMENT ACT from the standpoint of economic subordination not personal subordination because the concept of worker on the constitution law represents the proletariat.
The Supreme do not account for this judgement in greater detail, The Caddie can not understand it. So we need the detail explanation. The Constitution Act is the superior law in the legal system. Therefore it controls the labor law. If the labor law breaches the constitution law, the article of labor law is void.
There are the employees’ rights to enhance working conditions on the 33 article of Constitution Act. That are the right to independent association, collective bargaining, and collective action. By the way, we can not find the explanation to concept of worker on the Constitution Act. So the explanation to the concept of worker should be given.
To get the concept of worker on the Constitution Act we need to acknowledge how the right to independent association was adopted into the Constitution Act. In other words that is to know the historical nature of constitution.
The system of industrial capitalism as the result of Industrial Revolution beginning in England happened a lot of problems. To resolve them Socialism arose. The supporter of capitalism adopt the social rights into constitution law against the socialism. One of them is the right to independent association. That is the concept of worker includes the antagonistic relationship between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. In brief the concept of worker represents the proletariat.
To the conclusion, The Supreme court must judge the worker of TRADE UNION AND LABOR RELATIONS ADJUSTMENT ACT from the standpoint of economic subordination not personal subordination because the concept of worker on the constitution law represents the proletariat.
목차
Ⅰ. 서
Ⅱ. 헌법상 노동3권의 탄생과정
Ⅲ. 헌법상 단결권(노동3권)과 근로자의 개념
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
노동조합법상 근로자 개념 확대와 그 후속문제에 대한 단상
노동법학
2019 .12
-
노조법상 근로자 개념에 대한 재검토
고려법학
2021 .09
-
보험설계사의 노동법상 쟁점과 과제
노동법논총
2019 .12
-
직업안정법상 ‘직업’의 재검토 - 근로자 개념을 중심으로 -
법학논총
2016 .01
-
플랫폼 노동자의 근로권에 관한 헌법적 검토
헌법학연구
2024 .09
-
계약노동 종사자간 공동행위에 대한 공정거래법과 노동조합법의 중첩적 적용 문제
경쟁법연구
2023 .04
-
근로자 경영참여에 관한 법적 검토
노동법포럼
2016 .11
-
일터민주주의를 위한 노동법적 과제
노동법학
2020 .09
-
노동3권 소고
민주법학
2019 .01
-
사회복지사의 근로형태 분석과 권리보호방안 - 한국과 미국의 비교연구 -
사회복지법제연구
2015 .01
-
노동조합법상 근로자를 판단하는 판례의 기준
노동법학
2019 .12
-
쟁의행위의 정당성 판단과 권리분쟁
법학연구
2016 .08
-
노동법상 근로자대표제도에 관한 법적 검토 - 최근 경제사회노동위원회 합의안의 내용과 관련하여 -
노동법포럼
2021 .02
-
전출과 근로자파견과의 관계
노동법포럼
2022 .07
-
고용환경의 변화, 노동법의 위기와 대응 : 노동보호법의 인적 적용범위를 중심으로
노동법학
2018 .09
-
디지털 전환시대 플랫폼 노동자의 법적 보호방안
법학연구
2021 .06
-
미국 공정근로기준법과 가사사용인의 법적지위
노동법학
2016 .06
-
외국인근로자의 헌법상 근로권보장과 고용허가제의 쟁점사항
한양법학
2015 .11
-
플랫폼 노동 종사자의 법적 지위와 권리 보호 방안
경영법률
2019 .01
-
순수한 노동조합 및 노동관계조정법상 근로자에 관한 부당노동행위 구제명령 중 수입상당액 지급명령의 가부 및 그 범위
사법
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-336-001479205