지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since the 1960s, the “Internal Development Theory” has always been at the crux of Korean historical studies, but nowadays the theory is facing challenges and is also being questioned. As a result it is not that well believed in, as much as it had been in the past, and with fading faith in the theory, Korean historical studies are also facing a crisis of their own. The question raised in this article is what should we do to cope with such challenge, and what should we do to revive Korean historical studies.
The decline of the ‘theory’ as well as problems in historical studies seem to be coinciding with each other, but the fundamental problem is that Korean historical studies have failed to transcend and reach excellence. Instead, they still lack ‘competitive edges.’ In the 1960s and ‘70s, historians considered the task of ‘getting over Colonial historical studies’ and by doing so recovering national pride as part of their sacred duty. In the 1980s, determined to make a contribution to democracy and social independence, historians tried hard to establish historical studies which were scientific in nature but could also be considered as a voice concerning issues of the time. Hence, Korean historical studies, determined to recreate and reconstruct Korean history (in which the Korean people supposedly developed themselves) in a progressive and independent fashion, in retrospect had a built-in flaw, which could be described as a teleological approach.
In a social atmosphere where everyone agreed with the notion that Korean historical studies should unite and strive for a common goal, such problems, as well as continual drop in academic supremacy, were never brought to people’s attention. But the society has changed, and while Korean historians no longer share such self-imposed mandate, the outside world lost interest in historical studies of the Korean peninsula too. As a result, suddenly all kinds of problems cropped up, with problems of the “Internal Development Theory” heavily discussed. In the future, we should face the reality and work hard to pursue excellence again and regain public faith.
The decline of the ‘theory’ as well as problems in historical studies seem to be coinciding with each other, but the fundamental problem is that Korean historical studies have failed to transcend and reach excellence. Instead, they still lack ‘competitive edges.’ In the 1960s and ‘70s, historians considered the task of ‘getting over Colonial historical studies’ and by doing so recovering national pride as part of their sacred duty. In the 1980s, determined to make a contribution to democracy and social independence, historians tried hard to establish historical studies which were scientific in nature but could also be considered as a voice concerning issues of the time. Hence, Korean historical studies, determined to recreate and reconstruct Korean history (in which the Korean people supposedly developed themselves) in a progressive and independent fashion, in retrospect had a built-in flaw, which could be described as a teleological approach.
In a social atmosphere where everyone agreed with the notion that Korean historical studies should unite and strive for a common goal, such problems, as well as continual drop in academic supremacy, were never brought to people’s attention. But the society has changed, and while Korean historians no longer share such self-imposed mandate, the outside world lost interest in historical studies of the Korean peninsula too. As a result, suddenly all kinds of problems cropped up, with problems of the “Internal Development Theory” heavily discussed. In the future, we should face the reality and work hard to pursue excellence again and regain public faith.
목차
들어가며
1. 내재적 발전론에 대한 이론적 비판과 공감의 현실
2. ‘사명감’ 시대의 종말과 위기의 도래
3. 위기 극복의 길 : 학문 경쟁력의 회복
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘역사적 위기’: 개념, 이론, 활용
韓國史學史學報
2021 .12
-
위기 후 성장에 대한 목회신학적 성찰
신학과세계
2020 .06
-
국가와 위기의 상호구성성과 포스트 코로나 시대에의 함의
담론201
2023 .02
-
위기 담론과 고고 자료의 관계성 연구
영남고고학
2023 .05
-
‘우물’에 빠진 철학, 탈출구는 있는가?
철학논총
2015 .04
-
언어 네트워크 연구를 통해 본 고교 한국사 교과서의 역사인식 — 내재적 발전론의 의미구조를 중심으로
인문논총
2018 .01
-
위기 속에서 공유되는 사명감, 비평가적 자의식을 탐구해나가는 여정! — 『괴수 8호』와 문학비평(가)
자음과모음
2024 .09
-
나의 학문 활동
한국고대사연구
2015 .03
-
혼성 텍스트의 (무)의미 : 루이스 캐럴의 『스나크 사냥』
새한영어영문학
2015 .11
-
지역의 위기, 문명의 위기, 농의 위기와 그 극복
원불교사상연구원 학술대회
2022 .10
-
중국민속학이라는 학문과 학문공동체
실천민속학연구
2023 .02
-
기후 위기를 해결하려면
한국여성신학
2019 .12
-
‘류큐사’는 어떻게 ‘국사’에 편입되었나― 아키야마 겐조(秋山謙蔵)의 사례를 중심으로 ―
일본학보
2022 .11
-
위기를 넘는 우리의 방식
황해문화
2025 .03
-
기후 위기는 정의의 위기다
타우마제인
2024 .09
-
외국인 유학생의 한국어 능력이 학업 성취도에 미치는 영향 연구-학습 변인 간의 매개 경로 분석을 중심으로-
이중언어학
2017 .01
-
기후위기, 노동의 위기
황해문화
2022 .03
-
제2차 세계대전 시 프랑스의 위기관리 및 조치 실패원인
군사연구
2016 .01
-
담화 구성 능력에 기초한 한국어 문법 사용 양상 연구-담화 생성에 기여하는 문법 요소를 중심으로-
이중언어학
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-911-000645715