메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이재민 (서울대학교)
저널정보
서울대학교 아시아태평양법연구소 Journal of Korean Law Journal of Korean Law Vol.23 No.2
발행연도
2024.8
수록면
321 - 362 (42page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
With increasing attention to ADRs, arbitration is chosen by many disputing parties to settle their disputes. Arbitration also takes place as regards a dispute between a government agency and a private entity. Korea also observes this new phenomenon these days. This agency-private entity arbitration raises many novel questions. Apparently, arbitration is mainly designed to address disputes over private law instead of public law. Arbitration between a government agency and a private party, however, sometimes addresses public law matters as one of the key issues in the dispute. Attempting to settle these public law matter disputes through arbitration stands to raise a structural tension, as it puts a public law matter into a private law dispute settlement scheme. It may not be able to sufficiently safeguard public interest. Similar concerns over investment arbitration through ISDS proceedings have been robustly raised these days, but commercial arbitration between an agency and a private entity has received relatively scant attention even if it deals with almost the same type of public law matters between almost the same type of parties. Korea is also confronted with this new challenge in agency-private entity commercial arbitration. And yet, relevant Korean statutes do not seem to be structured in a way to properly address this new challenge. Clarification and adjustment are needed through future amendments.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0