지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.3
- 수록면
- 117 - 133 (17page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The acquisition and compensation for public work projects are usually faced with a violent resistance because of the taking behind. This project procedure encourages the property owners to engage a strong claim from the forced expropriation, while the project operator feels no need to make haste to the negotiation. This causes the intense conflicts between two parties, when the other ADR(Alternative Dispute Resolution) is desirably introduced in compensation of public works.
Currently the concerned Act has two ADRs ; the Verification of Agreements and Conciliation both by Land Tribunal. The former is sometimes useful from the effect, the same one with adjudication by Tribunal. The latter is merely deemed an agreement with the parties concerned. Both provide no happy solution to each party resulting in resorting to litigation
Therefore the new ADR system is necessary for compensation procedure. One of the useful ADR is the Arbitration. The arbitration is actually useful for compensation procedure from the merit of the same effect as the conclusive and irrefutable judgement of the court. The "Arbitration" means a procedure to settle disputes not by the judgment of the court, but by the decision of arbitrator. Japan has already introduced the arbitration by revising Land Expropriation Act in 2001.
Korea has the <Arbitration Act> as a general law of arbitration created in 1966. Many disputing fields(medical, environment, press and so on) have already implemented the arbitration with creating the special laws while others(criminal, maritime, sports etc) preparing them.
For the public work projects the arbitration system could be introduced by revising the <Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works projects>. The disputing party submits the arbitration request to local government with a previous written agreement. Arbitral proceedings shall commence with forming the arbitral tribunal by appointing three from the member of the Tribunal. The arbitral awards will be effective as the final judgement. The Arbitration system in public project compensation will cut down the social loss either material or immaterial, furthermore help the conflicting parties with providing a alternative and effective solution
Currently the concerned Act has two ADRs ; the Verification of Agreements and Conciliation both by Land Tribunal. The former is sometimes useful from the effect, the same one with adjudication by Tribunal. The latter is merely deemed an agreement with the parties concerned. Both provide no happy solution to each party resulting in resorting to litigation
Therefore the new ADR system is necessary for compensation procedure. One of the useful ADR is the Arbitration. The arbitration is actually useful for compensation procedure from the merit of the same effect as the conclusive and irrefutable judgement of the court. The "Arbitration" means a procedure to settle disputes not by the judgment of the court, but by the decision of arbitrator. Japan has already introduced the arbitration by revising Land Expropriation Act in 2001.
Korea has the <Arbitration Act> as a general law of arbitration created in 1966. Many disputing fields(medical, environment, press and so on) have already implemented the arbitration with creating the special laws while others(criminal, maritime, sports etc) preparing them.
For the public work projects the arbitration system could be introduced by revising the <Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works projects>. The disputing party submits the arbitration request to local government with a previous written agreement. Arbitral proceedings shall commence with forming the arbitral tribunal by appointing three from the member of the Tribunal. The arbitral awards will be effective as the final judgement. The Arbitration system in public project compensation will cut down the social loss either material or immaterial, furthermore help the conflicting parties with providing a alternative and effective solution
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 현행 중재제도 개요
Ⅲ. 일본 토지보상 중재제도
Ⅳ. 토지보상과 중재제도
Ⅴ. 중재제도 운용과 관련된 문제
Ⅵ. 맺으며
참고문헌
참고문헌 (43)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
공익사업 보상에서 중재제도 도입방안
법학연구
2022 .12
-
중국 법원의 Hybrid 중재판정에 대한 태도 : Insigma Technology Co. Ltd v. Alstom Technology Ltd 사건을 중심으로
관세학회지
2015 .08
-
The Language of Arbitration Agreements and Availability of Class Arbitration: Focusing on the U.S. Supreme Court's Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela Decision
중재연구
2021 .09
-
The Significance of the Language of Arbitration Agreements – Focusing on the recent U.S. court's decision denying confirmation of arbitral award in Spineway SA v. Strategos Group LLC
중재연구
2024 .09
-
Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards under England Arbitration Act
중재연구
2021 .09
-
중재 활성화를 위한 중재비용 구조제도의도입 방안 연구 - 민사소송법상 소송구조에 착안하여 -
중재연구
2024 .03
-
집단중재의 성질에 관한 고찰
비교사법
2023 .05
-
중재산업진흥법의 주요내용과 발전적 운용
중재연구
2017 .01
-
국제중재절차의 디지털화를 위한 최근 동향과 시사점
무역보험연구
2018 .01
-
한국 중재산업 발전 방안
중재연구
2018 .01
-
중국 중재제도의 새로운 발전과 외국중재판정 승인 및 집행에 관한 연구
중재연구
2015 .01
-
중국의 국제상사중재에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2017 .06
-
‘중재연구’ 30년간의 연구동향 분석- 한국중재학회 창립30주년에 즈음한 학술연구 동향분석 -
중재연구
2021 .06
-
2016년 중재법의 주요 개정내용과 문제점
법학연구
2017 .08
-
중국 해협양안 중재센터(海峡两岸仲裁中心) 중재규칙의 특징과 남북상사중재위원회 중재규칙 제정의 시사점
중재연구
2018 .01
-
论医疗纠纷仲裁困境之化解
의생명과학과법
2018 .01
-
中国国际商事仲裁协议效力认定问题研究
중재연구
2018 .01
-
국제상사분쟁해결방법으로서의 국제중재에 관하여 — 실무적 절차의 흐름과 장단점을 중심으로 —
법학연구
2017 .01
-
선택적 중재합의에 관한 판례의 재검토
인권과 정의
2024 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-595-002736737